Elections out: Proposal to reinstate Great Issues rejected

(Last updated: 08/28/09 6:29pm) Less than 4 percent of undergraduate students voted in ASMSU's elections, which ended Monday. On the ballot were four proposals and the candidates for every student's respective college on Academic and Student assemblies. Here are the results:

Academic Assembly (college)

Agriculture and Natural Resources: Henry Reinart

Arts and Letters: None

Business: None

Communication Arts and Sciences: None

Education: Megan Thoma

Engineering: None

James Madison: David Mindell, Jennifer Houghton

Natural Sciences: Amanda Venettis, Thomas J. Prebish

Nursing: None

Social Science: Maryanna Burleson

Student Assembly (college)

Agriculture and Natural Resources: Martin Villarreal, Huzaifah Nasir

Arts and Letters: Piper Marunick

Business: Srinivas Sakamuri, Harry Wang, Garry Hartlieb

Communication Arts and Sciences: Juan Carlos Elizalde, Natalie Venuto, Ashley Rittenhouse

Education: Kneisha Garrett

Engineering: Chris Miller, William Burgers II, Kevin McAlpine

James Madison: Bradley McDonald, Leo Madarang

Natural Sciences: Emily Jackson, Megan Bardwell, Sarah Skrbina, Matthew Hovey

Nursing: None

Social Science: Stuart Kelly, Ben Morlock, David Schmidt, Michael Webber, Michael Leahy

Proposal 1 — Constitutional change regarding language describing the outreach committee

YES (592-247)

Proposal 2 — Constitutional change to have the outreach committee become a standing subcommittee

YES (750-175)

Proposal 3 — Should the Student Assembly decision to remove Great Issues as a Programming Board Activity Department be reversed, which would reinstate Great Issues as an Activity Department on ASMSU Programming Board?

NO (586-552)

Proposal 4 — Do you mandate the ASMSU Student Assembly to thoroughly consider the membership's recommendation to authorize ASMSU Programming Board to decide its own policies and procedures?

YES (633-399)

Source: ASMSU

Originally Published: 03/27/07 1:00am