Sad array of GOP nominees in 2008

Michael Stevenson
The 2008 presidential election posturing is in full swing and opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are being spewed campuswide. Professors and students alike respectfully and thoughtfully listen to the thoughts of their classmates, regardless of their side of the aisle. Right?
Not quite. Now more than ever, the conservative that begins spouting off some opinions about “baby murdering” or “big-government liberals” seems to get a bigger beatdown than Lloyd Carr.
Conservative Republicans are scrambling to “right” the plight of their party. Having an “R” next to your name on a ballot could potentially mean death in an election.
For example, I once had a sociology professor attempting to rectify years of racial injustice by telling us to enact certain radical social policies. He classified Americans into two groups: liberals and bigots. That’s not even the most troubling part.
No one, neither staff nor students, voiced a single word of opposition to his opinion. I am proudly further left than Dennis Kucinich, and even I was mildly offended.
It’s a sad state of affairs for members of the GOP when they can’t respond in the one place they’re supposed to rightfully express their (mostly misguided) opinions — the free and open atmosphere of a university. So what has caused this collapse of these typically heated debates?
Year after year of the Bush administration’s incompetent actions and inept policies, not to mention the fact that it’s been plagued by scandal since the Florida mishap in 2000, have led to a climate of shame that is associated with being on the right.
President Bush’s policies lost Republicans both chambers of Congress in the midterm elections and, more importantly, lost them respect in the minds of millions of Americans.
Although the president thinks he’s doing quite well — so well in fact that he was overheard telling Australian Prime Minister John Howard that we were “kicking ass” in Iraq — Bush digs his party into a deeper and deeper hole with blatant civil rights violations, incompetent underlings, greater losses of life in Iraq, poll numbers so low they might be counted on one hand É the list goes on.
But, my point isn’t to bash Bush. That’s easier than walking. One must look at the effects of his presidency and the climate of corruption and immorality it has caused.
Not only did Bush manage to lose Republicans in both chambers of Congress, but several governorships and state legislatures as well.
The constant scandals from the executive branch made it easy for state-elected officials to brand their opponents “Bush lovers,” or someone who is a simple extension of Bush idiocy.
The right is eerily quiet. But it’s not only the president who is damaging the reputation of his party.
Scandals from elected officials such as Mark Foley or Larry Craig, both of whom were caught soliciting homosexual sex, don’t exactly convey a message of family values that their party so righteously claims. This is just the tip of the hypocritical iceberg.
Yet another problem arises for the GOP: The Democratic field of presidential nominees hasn’t been this strong in decades. Their competition can’t seem to energize the conservative base because of shallow reasons such as being Mormon, a supporter of abortion rights or just plain lame (sorry, John McCain fans, but you know as well as I do that his time is long gone).
In a recent poll of Republicans, The Associated Press found “none of the above” to be the winner when given a choice of potential candidates in the upcoming election.
Mickey Mouse might have a better chance as a Republican write-in candidate.
The GOP should get its act together and stop the scandals and moronic policies, maybe even gain some dignity back. I almost miss hearing about how I hug trees and love welfare abusers.
And if this Republican resurgence happens, the Democrats will be waiting with boxing gloves on. If not, the Democratic nominee will be able to feint left and be more than able to fight all the way to the White House, and believe me, she’s good at fighting.
Michael Stevenson is a State News columnist and a member of MSU College Democrats. Reach him at steve391@msu.edu.
Published on Monday, September 10, 2007



Comments
Buchanan 4 Prez
09/10/07 @ 9:47pm
It is too bad that Pat Buchanan isn’t running.
Paul
09/10/07 @ 9:49pm
I want a democrat to win this next election, but please, please, please don’t let it be Hillary “I’ll tell you whatever you want to hear and in the corresponding accent” Clinton. At this point I’m on hands and knees begging that Al Gore gets in this election, but somehow I don’t see that happening. So far Obama is looking to be the best choice.
Right-Wing 1
09/11/07 @ 12:04am
Our country needs someone like Augusto Pinochet or General Franco as president.
Shnar
09/11/07 @ 12:37am
The primacy of the governing body must be kicked down a notch. Laissez faire free market capitalism is the road to liberty and social sanity. When my productive capital is redistributed to organisms with no talent to speak of, this angers me greatly. As an organism, I have no social responsibility to abide by if I don’t want to have it. I do have a vested interest in protecting the family around me that I love, as such, I choose to use my productive works how I see fit.
Lou
09/11/07 @ 7:54am
I feel sad for you. The fact that you believe a liar, who has never done anything for another human being, is the best choice for President is just pitiful.
Jethro
09/11/07 @ 8:08am
I think this was the same place the Democrats were in 1991. Then Bill CLinton came along, and the Dems thought he was the best thing since sliced bread
Bryant
09/11/07 @ 8:14am
Are you kidding me? Have you not heard of Hsu? Did you not see Hillary on the floor of the Senate bragging about the capture of Saddam Hussein and doing her own research on the WMDs prior to voting for the war? What about William Jefferson, Democrat Louisiana, using military resources in the aftermath of hurricane Katrina to retrieve $90,000 of illegally obtained monies from his freezer? Or John Murtha on tape considering taking bribes at a later date once he has an established relationship with the briber? Or how about Ted Kennedy leaving a woman to drown to death so that he can get away and keep his cushy life style? Or what about Al Gore telling me I am killing the world because I drive to work instead of walking while he jets around the world in his private jets and uses more energy in one month heating his pool house then I do in a year heating my home? Or Harry Reid making millions on a property deal in which he sent up highway funds to build a highway next to the property he sold?
Secondly, her husband Billy lost congress for the Democratic Party for the first time in over 50 years with his (and her) scandals while in the White House. And if the Democratic Party is so great and scandal free, why is the approval rating for congress about half of what Bush’s is? Hint, it’s because they have done nothing but whine and complain about Bush and provided no solutions only obstruction.
Third, the none of the above poll you speak of most likely can out prior to Fred Thompson’s announcement, which meant most republicans were waiting for him before making any decisions.
CD
09/11/07 @ 12:36pm
It is completely inappropriate for any professor to make the claim that “there are two types of people, liberals and bigots”. An untenured professor making such a claim needs to be brought under review and at the least, be given a reprimand, with a tenured professor being given the latter. Such petty insults have zero place inside a university classroom.
Tancredo 2008
09/12/07 @ 7:00am
Tom Tancredo 2008!
Adam
09/12/07 @ 7:33pm
I didn’t think it was possible to be proudly left of Dennis Kucinich. I certainly wouldn’t admit something like that.
BM
09/15/07 @ 8:26pm
Ron Paul 2008