September 8, 2008

Editorial Board

Laura Misjak
Kate Polesnak
Lindsey Poisson
James Harrison
Keiara Tenant
Whitney Gronski

Candidates' Internet use may boost interest, votes

Public figures are increasingly resorting to unique Internet domains in an effort to relate to the masses.

First, it was the pope — with a snazzy Web site that tracks his every move — and now it’s the presidential candidates.

Web sites such as YouTube, Facebook and MySpace have become popular outlets for young voters to inform themselves about the candidates in this year’s presidential race.

Sen. Barack Obama’s speech on race has been viewed more than 4 million times since it first hit YouTube about four weeks ago. Not to mention the horde of Facebook groups dedicated to the candidates.

A Facebook group in support of Hillary Clinton has nearly 150,000 supporters and includes information such as her favorite books, movies, TV shows and an archive of recent speeches.

Supporters of Obama and Clinton can even befriend them on Facebook.

With the race for the Democratic nomination being so close between Obama and Clinton, young voters are playing a bigger role in the election and the candidates have to find ways to appeal to the younger crowd.

Accessibility of information about candidates via sites such as Facebook and MySpace may help to better inform young people because they retrieve most of their information from the Internet as opposed to a newspaper or news program.

Their presence on Facebook and MySpace can make candidates appear more like average people. It takes the candidates off their pedestals and puts them at a level where young people feel more connected to them.

The question is, will it compel them to vote?

However, mere access to this information might not necessarily mean young people will go out and vote. Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, was very popular on the Internet during his race for the Republican nomination, but when it all boiled down, not enough people supported him at the ballot box.

Hopefully online networking sites won’t fail at reeling in young voters as the “Vote or Die” campaign did in 2004. Ironically, some of the music artists that pushed the campaign weren’t even registered to vote.

Although the candidates have Facebook and MySpace pages, users should know they likely are not updating the pages themselves.

If the candidates are really looking to impress young people, a good way to utilize their profiles would be to update the pages themselves. If the candidates logged in every once in a while, it would show they care about the interests of young voters.

But being “friends” with candidates via the web may not equal a vote come November. We won’t know until then whether candidates’ Internet campaigns have been persuasive enough to inspire young voters to head to the ballot box.

However, the presidential hopefuls’ efforts are a good start for showing they are paying attention to the interests of young Americans.

Published on Tuesday, April 22, 2008

Comments RSS 2.0 Comment Feed

dude
04/23/08 @ 12:25am

Wait, could you please explain to me what the internet is again? Be sure to use lots of distracting cliches.

Dudes McCool
04/23/08 @ 2:42am

wats up obama? facebook me, bro!!!1!! ur teh uber 1337 cannid8!!!1!!
phased withrdrawal pwns!!!!

Exactly the type of person I want voting. Shouldn’t be a problem, though, since I doubt many of the “supporters” on facebook are even registered to vote. Don’t we go through this same discussion every election, about how young voters are going to change everything, thanks to a fantastic new way of communicating like facebook or websites or ASCII pr0n? And doesn’t it always turn out that it didn’t really make a difference? Oh well, at least it’s one less original idea opinion writers need to have every four years.

...so, you’re like pretty much guaranteed to get in to heaven if you’re in the pope’s top 8, right?

Bleed Green
04/23/08 @ 1:32pm

Yes, I think it’s important that the candidates update their own Facebook and Myspace pages. This is what our country needs. They should also be open to challenges on Scrabbulous and should joing my wagon train on Oregon Trail.

The SN editorial board could seriously use some proofreaders. This piece is poorly written even for THEM.

Joe
04/23/08 @ 3:31pm

So many people attack SN all the time, but they are always the one on the website or reading the paper.

If you hate them so much, why bother reading?

dude
04/23/08 @ 3:53pm

Personally, I am trying to “encourage” them to improve, since I pay SN taxes. They have often received harsh criticism, but I think the recent frustration has led to intense and deep sarcasm that unfortunately comes off as simply inflammatory.

It's just me...
04/23/08 @ 4:44pm

I only use the internet for lots and lots of porn

Jesus
04/29/08 @ 5:00pm

Next time Hal Bopp comes around, please hitch a ride by wearing Adidas shoes.

Lolcat
04/29/08 @ 5:01pm

I had ur facebook w my smiley happy nose! :X)

Chris Matthews
04/29/08 @ 5:05pm

I think Obama should consider re-introducing a measure for pencil making in Pennsylvania like a pencil factory but call them pennsyls and that will revitalize the Pennsylvania economy. do they have one of these plants already? everyone needs them and you can sharpen them in the classroom but how many times have you had to change the pencil sharpener and got that black stuff on your hand!! ahhhh!!! haha