July 24, 2008

Lawful reaction to riot necessary

**Eric Gregory**

Eric Gregory

I got back to my apartment around 11 p.m. Saturday night, only to find about 4,000 of my closest friends partying in the streets surrounding my home: Cedar Village.

This wasn’t anything I didn’t expect: Anyone with a heartbeat on campus knew for months about the resurrection of a 1980s-style “Cedar Fest.” When I heard the crowd from six blocks away, I was afraid I was about to see my building engulfed in flames. What I saw was a relatively controlled situation.

By around 1 a.m., however, I began to wonder if this party had run its course. I had seen plenty. This included girls taking photos with East Lansing police, the removal of a stop sign, bleeding heads from airborne glass bottles, public consumption of alcohol, flashing and many subsequent arrests. What else needed to happen?

“We want tear gas” was the chant I heard from my apartment. Watch out what you wish for.

The editorial “Student riot pointless; hurts MSU’s reputation” (SN 4/7) hit the nail right on the head. The people who remained in the streets after the declaration of an unlawful assembly were in clear violation of a 1968 state law prohibiting unlawful assembly or presence at an unlawful assembly. Moreover, when some people threw bricks and beer bottles at police officers, they should have expected a response.

And that response was rather restrained: Only 13 tear gas canisters were fired in comparison to the firing of 299 rounds in 2005. I think the police did their job: Getting a situation that seemed to be out of control under control.

The police acted in accordance with the law.

Now that we have seen the East Lansing police follow the law on the streets, it is time for the next step: following the law in its prosecution of crimes. East Lansing police Public Information Officer Kim Johnson told the Michigan Messenger the East Lansing police were “going after anyone that had any part of getting this party started.”

East Lansing police Chief Tom Wibert said “we intend to review the Web site posts and consider charges against the Web site originator and others who incited this riot.”

This apparently included the Facebook.com account holder who created the event for Cedar Fest.

I hope that before overzealous prosecution begins, East Lansing’s city attorney and the Ingham County prosecutor carefully examine state law and city ordinances.

It is unclear which statute the Facebook author violated. Might the author actually be guilty of inciting a riot?

Not according to the 1968 state law that is still on the books. The statute in this case only applies to an individual “intending to cause or to aid or abet the institution or maintenance of a riot” or to anyone urging unlawful behavior. The now-defunct Facebook event called for a street party. A prosecuting attorney would be hard-pressed to make the case that the author intended to cause a riot or that he or she should be held responsible for the actions of thousands of other individuals.

I’m not a lawyer, but I looked through Michigan’s compiled laws for any other statute that would in some way regulate Internet postings related to the incident. The only other section that had any reference to “riot,” “unlawful assembly,” or “Internet,” is an amended 1931 act that forbids the dissemination of malicious messages about others without consent.

My obviously unsolicited advice to prosecuting attorneys here is not to go overboard. People who committed assaults, destroyed public property or in any other way obviously violated the law, should certainly be charged with a crime.

But charging someone with a crime for creating an event last November? I don’t see how there’s much of a case there — particularly when there doesn’t even seem to be a law that this person broke.

The bottom line is representatives of the city should not squander public support in the wake of the police’s handling of this incident by threatening charges in cases where no apparent crime has been committed.

Let’s keep the long arm of the law in its proper and well-defined place.

Eric Gregory is a State News columnist. Reach him at ericwgregory@gmail.com

Published on Monday, April 7, 2008

Comments RSS 2.0 Comment Feed

Rachael
04/07/08 @ 7:42pm

Nice column, Eric.

This is poorly headlined though (heads up, SN copy editors), because I feel like the most important point in this piece is the role of Facebook in prosecuting students involved in Cedar Fest. I hope the State News covers this issue further.

Mike Saelim
04/08/08 @ 1:44am

This is the second day in a row that the column has been mistitled. Does the person titling these things even read the article, or does he or she just run a search for buzzwords and fill in the blanks?

That aside, this is a nice column. It’s very enlightening to learn about the immense difference between the number of gas canisters fired compared to 2005.

Matt
04/08/08 @ 8:06am

This should be titled FACE CROOK?

Obey Obama - now
04/08/08 @ 8:08am

“ .. Let’s keep the long arm of the law in its proper and well-defined place.”

Ooh! If we’d only had this kind of deep thinking before WWII, there would have never been a WWII.

I’m reminded of what the old Filipina said Hirosima: “two weren’t enough.”

bbwhine
04/08/08 @ 10:12am

Dear Obey: I think they now have medication for folks like you. Having scattered thoughts and tangential thinking can in some cases actually be treated. Good luck.

Alum05
04/08/08 @ 11:53am

I agree completely with the article written. My only question is to who authorized such a ‘party’? Unless anyone has been living under a rock on campus, every recent gathering at Cedar Village has turned into mass chaos. This event should have never taken place, period.

question
04/08/08 @ 1:31pm

couldn’t he be prosecuted for hosting an unlawful assembly then once it was declared that before the tear gas?

just a thought, maybe not inciting a riot, but the police can get something there.

Biff
04/08/08 @ 2:16pm

Good take on a troubling issue…restrained goverment intervention even on personal safety issues.

Obey Obama
04/08/08 @ 4:26pm

“ .. I think they now have medication ..

for LIB-BURR-AL Whine Syndrome.

It’s called actually doing real work and actually accomplishing something. Instead silly tool-pulling and bloviating, like trying to encourage the film industry to leave sunny California for Iceland West (a.k.a., Michigan). Totally inane and absurd — more taxpayer money out the window.

Higher standards — more flunk-outs — real grades — less rioting.

common sense
04/08/08 @ 5:27pm

obey obama,

The Big Ten and Ivy League are notoriously liberal. How do you suggest they improve their academic standards to become the next Bob Jones, Truman State, or Hillsdale again?

Obey Obama
04/08/08 @ 6:10pm

How do you suggest they improve their academic standards ..

—-

Authentic grades — rigorous exams — more flunk-outs — less rioting.

MSU’s faculty is totally capable of making courses more intellectually rigorous. MSU’s academic reputation would improve.

But with the debt load of all the buildings — that’s never going to happen.

MSU needs the $$$$$$$$$$ of those 15% of freshmen who leave after first year.

It’s about money. That is all it is.

Elizabeth
04/08/08 @ 6:25pm

Your condemnation of the party people is well directed. I will be surprized if there is an arraignment of the facebook person. People were really chanting, “We want gas.”?

Mikadelic74
04/08/08 @ 6:35pm

Well stated Eric! Nice to see someone out here has full use of their brain. It is absolutely ludacrist that ELPD would try and prosecute anyone who wanted to have a party, yet probably had no intention or concept of what really would happen. I wonder though if the maturity level of party goers will ever reach beyond a 2 year old mentality. When the 1999 Riots were going on I had a party in a warehouse in old town Lansing with 6000 attendees, it was the place to be that night. We had a blast, there was no violence. Thus, proving that it is possible to party with peace of mind, or for that matter, PEACE IN MIND!!! Time to grow up kids. Do you really want that FELONY on your record? THINK!!!

Obey Reagan
04/09/08 @ 9:26am

Hey Obey Obama,
Why stop there? Why don’t we just go Plato on everyone’s a$$ and weed all those who are mentally and physically inept (such as yourself), keep them from reproducing and maybe we’ll get the world Reagan is dreaming of while rotting in his grave.

The CHamp
04/09/08 @ 9:44am

not only was the “Lawful reaction to riot necessary” it was also funny.

nothing is funnier than a bunch of drunk students (or protesters) getting tear gassed!

kudos to the ELPD!

Lack of INFO!!!
04/09/08 @ 10:28pm

Ok folks…as far as the Facebook author. He can be prosecuted for inciting a riot. His orginal Facebook page, which the majority of people did not see, stated over and over that he wanted the fest to result in a riot…“this would bring back the tradion of Cedarfest”. ELPD contacted him and explained to him that he could be charged. This article really missed that information. If you don’t believe it, watch over the next few weeks as this makes its way to court. They will show all of the original post. Hope this sheds some light.