July 24, 2008

Editorial Board

Laura Misjak
Kate Polesnak
Lindsey Poisson
James Harrison
Keiara Tenant
Whitney Gronski

Recruiting felons for military risky, unavoidable

The U.S. military branches have had their fair share of scandals in the last few years.

But now for the latest shocker: felons in the military.

Army recruits with past felony convictions increased from 249 in 2006 to 511 in 2007, according to The New York Times.

Marine recruits with felonies on their records went from 208 to 350 in the same respective years. Waivers have been made for numerous kinds of felonies, including aggravated assault with a dangerous weapon, burglary, possession of nonmarijuana narcotics, kidnapping, making terroristic threats, rape and sexual assualt. However, the military thoroughly evaluates applicants’ records, often finding their felonies were committed as juveniles, or that their offenses were less serious.

At first glance, this looks insane. With all the training and exposure to expensive, lethal equipment and high-tension situations, it seems a little risky to bring in convicted felons to fight alongside other troops.

Might it be a bad idea to trust those who’ve made poor decisions in the past not to do the same in stressful combat situations?

Now doesn’t appear to be the time to be picky.

Many recruiters are starting to find that those qualified to serve in the military aren’t volunteering. And as the U.S. Army and Marine Corps start running low on troops to send to the Middle East, they don’t seem to have any other choice than to lower standards.

The U.S. military is stretched far too thin.

But convicted felons? They won’t let people with allergies to bee stings and peanut butter in the military, but they’ll allow those who’ve committed crimes?

Well, look at it this way: With military mistakes such as friendly fire, murder, rape and the events at Abu Ghraib, even those without felony convictions can make bad choices.

There are bad eggs everywhere.

Admitting that those convicted of serious crimes are serving does nothing more than put the public on alert, waiting for the first mistake made by a convicted felon serving in the military. Then there will be an easy scapegoat.

Our society largely believes that convicted and jailed felons can be rehabilitated. Those with a record, however, are undeniably held to a different standard than everyone else.

They aren’t permitted to legally own firearms, many employers are wary of hiring those with a criminal past and many other opportunities are forever unattainable.

If we truly believe in rehabilitation, those who’ve done their time should be given the chance to serve their country and contribute to the community.

Published on Wednesday, April 23, 2008

Comments RSS 2.0 Comment Feed

Steve
04/23/08 @ 9:27pm

Or the fact that the military might be able to help provide these people with some structure and discipline… something they clearly lacked before. It is not unheard of for a juvenile’s sentence to be waived if they joined the military.

“But convicted felons? They won’t let people with allergies to bee stings and peanut butter in the military, but they’ll allow those who’ve committed crimes?”
-This is the first time I have agreed with the State News in a long time. What’s ridiculous is that many people in the military develop problems that they would normally be excluded for. But since they are already in the military they will not drop them, they will allow them to continue to serve. But if you had it before joining (and were overly honest and told them about it) then you be penalized and won’t be allowed to serve your country.

The Champ
04/24/08 @ 12:10am

So?
what do THIS editorial board know about the military that protects them?
answer: nothing. even worse, none of them are YET taxpaying contributors who would give them at least a hint of a standing to criticize.

antieditorialist
04/24/08 @ 12:15am

Check out these recent ‘opinions’ this ‘editorial board’ has put out recently:

Recruiting felons for military risky, unavoidable
Earth Day must be more effective to be useful
Room rate hike needed, may make students flee
No easy answer for responding to graffiti threats
Extending Mich. bar hours has perks, problems
Students should respect professors in class

Been There
04/24/08 @ 9:13am

I attempted to sign up for the Army a couple years back but when I was honest with my recruiter and told her I had an allergy to bees/wasps and seafood, I wasn’t allowed to continue in the process.

Bleed Green
04/24/08 @ 9:25am

Yeah, funny they’ll allow convicted felons to serve and not openly gay people…

Homer
04/24/08 @ 9:35am

The recruiting of felons in not uncommon in US military history. Years ago judges often gave the choice military service or jail time to defendants before the bench. R. Lee Ermey of “Full Metal Jacket” fame was one such person; and a great uncle of mine choose the Navy over time in a U.P. county jail. In the Navy he was able to learn a trade (electrician) that he would not have learned in jail. If you tour the USS Constitution at the Charlestown Navy Yard in Boston, the docents – who are active duty Navy Sailors – will tell you that many of the crewmen of the ship came from questionable backgrounds as well.

bbwhine
04/24/08 @ 10:26am

Champ: Not sure how paying taxes qualifies a person to know anything about the military either. If ya’ ain’t done it, you know absolutely nothing about it. Hint: It’s not like the cartoon movies made by John Wayne, Ron Reagan, Gary Cooper, etc.

Barry Obama
04/24/08 @ 1:06pm

Bleed Green:
it’s simple. felons are notoriously tough people. “openly” gays are notorious flaming wimps. the military fights wars which generally calls for tough guys. no? so the rule makes good sense. i suspect you fall into the openly wimpy category. zing!

Bleed Green
04/24/08 @ 1:36pm

Brilliant logic there, Barry. Have you ever actually met a gay person?
And you can suspect what you will, but I won’t dignify that “zinger” with further response.

bbwhine
04/24/08 @ 4:38pm

Bad news for you Barry. A couple of hard ass Marines I knew in Vietnam, guess what? Turned out they were gay, moved to Frisco, the whole nine yards. Could’ve knocked me over with feather, had to redefine, re-evaluate the whole gay (back then we didn’t use that word if ya’ get my drift) thing of what gay meant and who they were. Also knew some “felons”, most fought hard, some were cowards. Mostly people are people and come in all the shapes and colors of the rainbow. You’ll figure it out when you get a littel more grown up.

Barry Obama
04/24/08 @ 6:33pm

the internet’s biggest liar revealed, ladies and gentlemen! you guessed it: bbwhine. based solely on the above recent comment. what a crock!

Ernie the Canman Can Man
04/29/08 @ 5:08pm

okay well how about this – using felons to commit crimes… then you dont have to worry about new criminals doin it. ha ha ha !! imagine tho seriously if u had the oompa loompas from charlie charcoal factory and they was felons then youd have a really bad case of stinky chocolate river!!! ha ha ha remember wen this girl she ate the blueberry and they rolled her out what if they rolled a joint!!

Ant Bee
04/29/08 @ 5:14pm
how about they just put everyone else in prison and let the felons go— so then the free people will make prison like a 5 star hotel like the East Lansing Motel 6 and then the felons would be like ‘hey we want in cuz thats where all the free people are’ and then they just trade places and then bam!! we got the felons in prison and they WANT to be there you know?
bbwhine
05/07/08 @ 1:38pm

Sorry Barry, didn’t mean to rock your concept of what it means to be a dude and all. It’s easier to call me a liar then accept the fact that not everything fits your notion of how the world works. At first it was a bummer for me too but as time went by it just no longer mattered.