Editorial Board
Laura Misjak
Kate Polesnak
Lindsey Poisson
James Harrison
Keiara Tenant
Justin Harris
Religious leaders' revamped images appeal to masses
Costco Wholesale Corp. and the Dalai Lama aren’t often mentioned in the same sentence. But his holiness and several business leaders, including Costco’s co-founder Jeffrey Brotman, were together Monday in Seattle for a business-inspired talk. Preaching the same peace and karma that he’s known for, the Dalai Lama offered business advice to eager ears.
But why is one of the holiest men in the world giving his advice on price markups?
In a world where globalization and interconnectedness are constantly expanding, it’s not surprising the Dalai Lama and other religious figures, including the pope, are entering new and different realms of society.
Instead of remaining distant religious leaders who appear untouchable to most of the world, the Dalai Lama and the pope have entered spheres of common culture.
As Pope Benedict XVI travels in the U.S. this week, his presence isn’t just felt in the places he visits. Unlike any previous pope, Benedict has embraced the Internet and its ability to reach a broad audience.
His trip has been blogged about, photographed and recorded, making the Internet the go-to source for all the dope on the pope.
His U.S. trip even has its own Web site, USPapalVisit.org, which tracks his every move and word from sea to shining sea.
The pope’s willingness to accept the Internet age allows him to reach a younger, broader audience.
Not only does this acceptance tap into a different group of people, but it also makes the pope seem more personable and less like an unreachable religious leader.
The Dalai Lama’s willingness to preach to business and policy leaders is another example of this new approach by world-renowned religious leaders.Again, in an attempt to reach a broader audience, the Dalai Lama is entering the public policy and economic sectors of life and applying the same ideals he’s always had.
Many have and will continue to flock to see these two influential leaders speak in the U.S., and their fanfare is similar to that of celebrities.
There are a number of people who venture to see these leaders simply because it’s a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.
But before people join the masses packed in ballparks or arenas, they should take the opportunity to think about what these religious leaders stand for and what they’re there to talk about. Unlike celebrities, the pope and the Dalai Lama are deeply rooted in a set of ideals that they will continue to preach, no matter the setting or audience.
In an age where the Internet is the world’s No. 1 medium of information exchange, it’s admirable to see two figures, often rooted in old-time tradition, putting forth effort to better connect with the world.
Perhaps they can set an example for other leaders across the globe now and in the future.
Published on Thursday, April 17, 2008

Comments
Fredrik
04/17/08 @ 10:58pm
Isn’t this just news?
Steve
04/18/08 @ 2:38am
Who cares about the Pope? He serves no purpose other than to ensure that a large portion of the drone population maintains its morals from the medieval era. At least he embraces the internet…. that’s a start for bringing him up to the 21st century. Now we just need to get them to drop the exorcism, devil, holy spirit and other non-sense he preaches about.
Steve
04/18/08 @ 5:27am
I have an even better idea yet. Maybe they can use the internet for all of their priests to download some porn instead of molesting more little boys and having church officials cover up for them.
Dan
04/18/08 @ 7:12am
1. How does the State News measure the holiness of someone? (i.e. “But why is one of the holiest men in the world giving his advice…”)
What is my holiness, then, on a scale of 1 to 10? I am curious…
2. “...are entering new and different realms of society.”
What is a realm of society? How can it be new? Who are the leaders of this mysterious realm? Is it ruled by purple people?
As for Steve, it’s so sad that the Church lowered their standards and allowed homosexual pedophiles into their clergy, isn’t it? I find it humorous when the left blame the sexual abuse on Christianity, and not on homosexual pedophilia.
Ben
04/18/08 @ 7:38am
“the pope and the Dalai Lama”
Why is only one capitalized?
Mark
04/18/08 @ 10:43am
Dan,
Everyone knows that you need to upload your photo to www.holyornot.com and the crowd will rate you on a 1-10 holy scale.
Benjy Compson
04/18/08 @ 12:09pm
“I find it humorous when the left blame the sexual abuse on Christianity, and not on homosexual pedophilia.”
First, I have never heard anyone blame sexual abuse by priests on Christianity. If they have, they don’t understand Christianity. Second, do not attempt to conflate homosexuality and pedophilia. The problem is pedophilia, period.
Here’s an interesting article: http://www.slate.com/id/2189285/
Nate
04/18/08 @ 12:35pm
Dan: So when did the church take the “are you a homosexual pedophile?” question off of their priest application?
Do you realize that priests have been sexually abusing children for centuries? Don’t you think there is some attraction for pedophiles to find a job where they have their own perusal of little children to molest, and can keep them quiet by terrorizing them with the thought of going to hell for speaking out?
The whole priest business is bullshit, and the Catholic Church is willing to sacrifice thousands of kids emotional stability just to keep up the notion that priesthood is holy and needed.
Where is Sinead O’Connor when you need her?
ugh
04/18/08 @ 3:12pm
I am really sick of ignorant people that connect the Catholic priesthood (yes a HOLY position) with pedophilia. A lot of us attend MSU which is a school recently known for rioting. Are we all crazy college kids flashing our boobs and throwing rocks at the police? Just because someone is a priest does not make them a pedophile, yet a few horrible men tarnished the reputation of many great men.
Steve
04/18/08 @ 3:53pm
Ugh – A few? Is that a joke? Estimates have put the number of molested children by Catholic priests in the US over 10,000… I don’t see how that’s a few.
Nate
04/18/08 @ 4:24pm
Steve beat me to it.
Also, I am not saying that every priest is a pedophile, but considering hundreds, maybe thousands, of priests have molested children (in the US alone), it seems to suggest that there is a bigger, deeper problem than just chalking it up to a “few horrible men.”
The fact that the pope (the current one and former ones) and his minions have a history of covering up this epidemic, and protecting the priests, leaves many to the conclusion that maybe, just maybe, these guys are not holy.
Weatherman
04/18/08 @ 9:59pm
Catholic priests = evil
Dalai Lama = good
Me
04/20/08 @ 4:14am
“More than 4,000 US Catholic clergy have been accused of sexually abusing minors since 1950.
The Church has paid out more than $2bn (£1bn) in compensation and legal fees, most of it since the scandal erupted in 2002.”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7356970.stm
Rider@UM.edu
04/20/08 @ 5:57pm
Ben:
the reason the students of the SN news did not capitalize Pope but did capitalize Dalhi Lama is because they are college students. And as such, it is VERY VERY VERY trendy/popular/fashionable for college kids to disrespect Protestants and Catholics; whereas, it is VERY VERY VERY unpopular to disrespect other religions like Buddhism and Islam (emphasis on Islam). It comes with the turf here.
Steve
04/20/08 @ 7:18pm
Actually Rider, I prefer to disrespect all of them. Every religion has one common thread: irrational thought.
Red Rider
04/20/08 @ 11:26pm
steve: disrespect and prejudice like that are other hallmarks of the aforementioned trend.