Drafted financial practices included in university ruling
A draft of an administrative ruling would create financial practices any student group collecting taxes through the university would be required to follow.
Financial practices included in the draft would require a group to send officers responsible for maintaining its finances to a training session on responsible financial practices.
The governing bodies would be required to submit an annual audited fiscal report by Nov. 1 to MSU’s vice president for student affairs and services, and the group’s investments and surplus resources must be stated within the report.
The governing bodies would be required to receive at least three bids for any contract totaling more than $10,000 or will extend beyond the then-current fee referendum.
Before a group enters into a contract for more than $10,000 or will extend beyond the then-current fee referendum, the group must receive written authorization from its adviser.
Source: Student FEE Collection Accountability Measures Administrative Ruling
Tax-collecting student groups challenge draft
Several of MSU’s tax-collecting student groups are questioning a draft of an administrative ruling that defines financial practices groups must follow to continue collecting student taxes.
Any student group collecting taxes through the university, including the MSU’s two student governments, Residence Hall Association and ASMSU, that don’t meet the proposed practices could have its account frozen or its ability to collect taxes suspended.
RHA’s president Mark Dobson said although the document answered questions the group had about how MSU’s tax collection process works, the suggested practices could threaten the autonomy of the groups.
“It seemed to me while the aim was, in the spirit of the document, to protect the autonomy of student tax-collecting agencies, the document isn’t and wasn’t exactly doing that,” Dobson said. “In fact, I think it is threatening autonomy.”
Lee June, vice president for student affairs and services, said almost every financial practice listed in the document already exists.
“Basically, all are existing practices or things we feel we need to implement to be in compliance with the university’s procedures on these types of matters,” June said.
Michael Leahy, ASMSU Student Assembly chairperson, said several parts of the document encourage financial responsibility, but the group is concerned by the current language of the ruling.
“The things that bother me is some of the different things that affect our ability to make our own decisions and how that will play out if our decision doesn’t agree with the university,” Leahy said.
June said the proposed financial practices stem from several discussions with MSU’s administrative offices, including MSU’s Office of the General Counsel, the Internal Audit Department and the Controller’s Office.
“Any organization examines its procedures after X number of years,” June said. “We always want to make sure we are doing things as efficiently and effectively as possible.”
The State News, which collects a student tax each semester, will not be affected by the drafted ruling because it already practices the accountability measures, said Marty Sturgeon, the paper’s general manager.
Groups affected by the changes will meet with June and Denise Maybank, associate vice president for student affairs and services, to give feedback on the document and offer possible revisions, June said.
“Once we get all the feedback, then we’ll look at whether we decide we need to do further revisions before the final document is put into effect,” June said.
Published on Wednesday, April 9, 2008





Comments
Nick K.
04/10/08 @ 7:19am
I’m surprised that these rules were not in place earlier — they have been in the manual for business procedures for the rest of the university for years… It is good practice to require bids or at least three options for any large amount of money..
The Downside
04/10/08 @ 11:21am
Nick: These groups already have competitive bidding and almost all of the other policies in place. The concern is the veto power given to the university to stop the groups from taking almost any major action as well as the new definition of the relationship in a negative way which is a bit too complicated to get into here.
Basically this would allow the university to prevent any of these organizations that are supposed to represent students from supporting a position that students like but the administration doesn’t.