Sunday February 12, 2012 | Since 1909 | East Lansing, MI Advertise | Classifieds | Puzzles | Employment | Contact Us | Subscriptions
Feed:
Follow us on:
Clear, 27° F | -3° C
7 day forecast

Some candidates not represented

Originally Published: 08/25/08 6:45pm Modified: 08/25/08 6:51pm 7 comments

*Ryan Dinkgrave*

Ryan Dinkgrave

You might not know it by watching the news on TV or reading a newspaper, but there are far more than two candidates running for president this fall.

Although headlines in the coming weeks will be dominated by the national conventions of the two largest parties, less visible candidates will be working every bit as hard as their Democratic and Republican challengers to drum up support for their own campaigns.

Third-party candidates seem lost in the tidal wave of campaign coverage for Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., and Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.

Some of these candidates are Green Party nominee and former Democrat Cynthia McKinney, independent candidate and former Green Party nominee Ralph Nader, Libertarian nominee and former Republican Bob Barr, and Constitution Party nominee Chuck Baldwin.

Additionally, former Republican Alan Keyes is the nominee of America’s Independent Party and the Reform Party’s nominee is Ted Weill. Further down the list, there also are candidates from the Prohibition Party, the Party for Socialism and Liberation, the Socialist Party USA, the Socialist Workers Party, the Peace and Freedom Party, and the Boston Tea Party.

Unfortunately, though each of these candidates have unique stories and positions to talk about, they will be almost entirely shut out by the mainstream media, as reporters dissect every word and step of the Obama and McCain campaigns in excessive detail.

Nader has based much of his campaign on emphasizing popular issues where his position is dramatically different from those of Obama and McCain. His independent campaign supports a universal single-payer health care system for all Americans, does not accept any corporate donations to his campaign and supports full equal rights for gays and lesbians. Despite the wide appeal of these positions, the media rarely discusses Nader’s campaign.

McKinney has been widely embraced by the Green Party for her positions on social and environmental issues and for her pursuit of the truth in high-profile national issues such as the Sept. 11th terrorist attacks. As an African American woman with a black Puerto Rican running mate in hip-hop activist Rosa Clemente, McKinney could appeal to many voters who aren’t especially swayed by Obama or McCain.

Barr was most known for being a leader in the impeachment of former President Bill Clinton, and in 2006 he defected to the Libertarian Party. Though a right-wing conservative for much of his congressional tenure, Barr was later an outspoken critic of President Bush’s policies on civil liberties. Such intrigue should warrant at least some attention from the mainstream media, but Barr has been largely ignored.

That these candidates are not heard on a greater level is an illustration of the less-than-democratic process by which presidents are elected in this country and the complicity and willingness of much of the mainstream media to continue the duopoly of the Democratic and Republican parties.

Especially in the years since Ross Perot threatened to break that duopoly in 1992, the two largest parties have been on the offensive, actively working to make sure that citizens do not hear from or about any candidates other than their own.

These efforts have included keeping “third-party” candidates out of the debates, creating excessive hurdles to ballot access and trying to scare voters away from supporting such candidates by engaging in character assassination and alleging that they are “spoilers.”

One role of the mainstream media and free press in a democratic society should be to inform voters of the great diversity of voices and choices available to them in the election, rather than focusing solely on Obama and McCain. Imagine the robust, lively debates that would ensue if more candidates were permitted to participate and were accordingly covered in the press.

Instead, it is up to the voter to seek information on these candidates, further dwindling their chances of reaching audiences of significant size and influence.

Given the lack of media and public attention paid to “third-party” candidates, is it any wonder that most modern presidential elections have been determined by slim margins of victory between just two candidates?

Ryan Dinkgrave is a State News columnist and a public relations graduate student. Reach him at dinkgrave@gmail.com.


Article Tools:
Short URL:
http://www.statenews.com/r/fc68593e


FEATURED CLASSIFIEDS: More classifieds »

In Employment:

In Apts. For Rent:

In Services:


Powered by Disqus

PHOTOS OF THE WEEK:More reprints »
  • Fireworks

    A firework display shimmers and shines above Cooley Law School Stadium Sunday night after the Lansing ...

  • 44119_mdh_fea_florence2_062611f.jpg

    Florence Welch, lead singer of London-based indie group Florence and the Machine, throws up a sign of ...

  • Pile of bricks

    As deconstruction of the MSC smokestack continues, bricks pile up at the foot of the once iconic MSU ...

  • Archeology

    Paige Triezenberg, a global and area studies senior, uses a small trowel to clear dirt around an animal ...

  • Carillon

    Bournville, England resident Trevor Workman plays the carillon for the first Muelder Summer Carillon ...

Available for purchase today at State News Reprints.


EVENT CALENDAR More Events »

Commentary

Add your $0.02, go to the comment form or follow the comment feed

Mark
(08/26/08 9:25am)
Report
Comment

For information on why restricting the voice of third parties may actually be a good thing.
This video does not address this, but if you have half a brain you should be able to extrapolate.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6127548813950043200&ei=zgm0SNzhMIL2-gHHqo2kDQ&q=type%3Agoogle+engEDU++choice


David
(08/26/08 11:45am)
Report
Comment

Oh Mark your right. Third parties suck. I mean, they only were responsible for the abolition of slavery and women’s right to vote.

Well, have fun voting for your Republicrat and having Corporations run your life!


Mark
(08/26/08 2:55pm)
Report
Comment

I am probably wrong, but I do not think it is all that accurate to say that third parties were responsible for the abolition of slavery.

I thought what had happened is that the Whigs were in disarray as the opposition party and combined with some anti-slavery Democratic to form the Republican party.
That does not really qualify as a third party, but a reformation of the opposition party.

I really cannot remember what 3rd political party stimulated the right for women to vote. There were sufferage interest groups, but I cannot remember a third party.


Kram
(08/26/08 3:04pm)
Report
Comment

David:
If you wanted to agree with Mark, you would say “you are right” or “you’re right” – not “your right”.
But, I don’t think you want to agree with anyone.
You credit 3rd party organizations with the abolition of slavery and the right to vote for women? You are so catagorically wrong that it makes the head spin. However, even if your assertion were true, do you consider these laudable accomplishments? Whom do you think has advanced the unchecked spread of liberal socialism that we are all presently subject to?


Joe
(08/26/08 4:28pm)
Report
Comment

Kram, every who stops by this page is dumber for reading your post.


Phil Letten
(08/26/08 11:01pm)
Report
Comment

Good article. I wish third party candidates were given a chance by the media. Obama and McCain are pretty much the same candidate and one of them is pretty much guaranteed to win in November. They’re both going to continue the war, both won’t promise against a pre-emptive strike on Iran, both won’t even promise against a draft, both support the war on drugs, both support the patriot act, both support that new FISA bill, and the list could go on.

Cynthia McKinney, Ralph Nader, Bob Barr, and Chuck Baldwin are all better than the two major candidates.


Kram
(08/27/08 3:58pm)
Report
Comment

Joe
Shaddap!