Sunday February 12, 2012 | Since 1909 | East Lansing, MI Advertise | Classifieds | Puzzles | Employment | Contact Us | Subscriptions
Feed:
Follow us on:
Clear, 27° F | -3° C
7 day forecast

Rodent remedy

Rats, mice often used in scientific research at MSU to study diseases, treatment options

By Liz Kersjes Originally Published: 10/16/08 11:35pm Modified: 10/17/08 12:13am 14 comments

RodentResearch
Illustration by Chelsea McGorisk The State News Reprints

Soon, lab animals might not spend their entire lives in the laboratory. Thanks to one student and a mistake in a shipment of hamsters to an MSU lab for a research project, the university might create an official policy for placing rodents unneeded for research up for adoption. “The researchers only needed male hamsters, but for some reason they sent female hamsters too,” said junior Erin Schultz, an animal technician who works primarily with rodents in an on-campus animal facility. “The females would’ve just been euthanized — and I didn’t want to see them euthanized because I thought they were really cute.”

Schultz found homes for the hamsters and received a fair amount of interest from other students in adopting more animals, Director of Campus Animal Resources Rob Werner said.

“It heightened my awareness of the issue,” said Werner, an MSU-attending veterinarian. “The main thing is we want to make sure we try to do what is best for the animals.”

Adoption policy

The university occasionally adopts out dogs and cats – but it’s relatively rare to adopt out rodents, although there is an unstated policy that the university will try, Werner said.

Most of the adopted rodents have gone to people who have worked with the researchers and know them personally.

There are several factors to consider when deciding how and who should receive them. It can be difficult to know whether a student will properly care for a rodent, which requires different care than a dog or cat, Werner said.

“Occasionally people have pet snakes and think, ‘Can I get free food for it?’” Werner said. “And sometimes kids around the fraternity house get a rat and want to see if it likes beer or not.”

MSU also has a policy against pets in dorms, aside from non-poisonous, non-carnivorous fish — and the university could be held liable if an adopted animal bites someone, Werner said.

Because of such issues, no more adoptions of lab animals will be permitted until an official adoption policy is defined and established with the Institutional Animal Care & Use Committee.

If research animals are not adopted, there are two other options: The lab can house and care for the animal until it dies naturally, or the animal can be euthanized.

Since it can be expensive to maintain the animal until it dies, and to prevent overcrowding in the labs, the animals are typically painlessly euthanized, Werner said.

Animals in research

Rodents are the animals of choice used in scientific research, said Marc Breedlove, an MSU Rosenberg professor of neuroscience.

Breedlove is the outgoing chair of the animal care committee, which oversees all research on campus that uses animals.

He said rats used to be the most common animals used but more mice are now being utilized.

“At every university all over the world, people are using mice for research,” he said.

Mice live for two years, which means scientists can compress the time span of ailments and disorders, Werner said.

An example is the study of tumors — in humans, tumors don’t start developing until a person is 40 years old or older, but mouse tumors develop in much less time, Werner said.

Mice also can be genetically manipulated with relative ease, meaning scientists can study things in mice they couldn’t study in dogs, cats or humans, Werner said.

For example, scientists have developed a mouse with no immune system, meaning they can transplant human tumors into a mouse and the mouse’s body won’t reject it, he said.

The debate

Werner works with University Laboratory Animal Resources, which cares for the animals used for research on campus and oversees the research to ensure the animals are treated humanely.

The university lab works directly with the animal care committee.

Of course, research on live animals is a hot topic.

Rats, mice and hamsters are not covered in the Animal Welfare Act, according to social relations and policy sophomore Mitch Goldsmith. Goldsmith is the event coordinator for Students Promoting Animal Rights, or SPAR, a registered student organization.

The Animal Welfare Act is the current law that protects animals from undue suffering. Goldsmith said rats, mice and hamsters aren’t in the act, which means there are no checks for human use.

Nick Vitale, a second-year veterinary graduate student, said he supports research on live animals. He said he wants to go into anatomic pathology, meaning he would do research on animal carcasses. Vitale said he hasn’t done research on live animals.

“I understand people who aren’t in favor of animal research, but you have to think about advances in medicine,” Vitale said. “I would ask right away, ‘Do you take any drugs, do you have family members who take drugs, do you have any friends or family members who have had surgery?’”

Vitale said it’s important to utilize the resources available for research, which include animal testing.

Regulating both human and animal testing also is important, Vitale said — and while there is pressure from some people and groups to stop using animals for research, the fact that veterinarians closely monitor lab animals in any facility justifies using the animals for research.

“I’m not saying we should thrust ourselves back into the Dark Ages — if the medicine is there and a cure is there, we should take advantage of it,” Goldsmith said. “We’re just asking the government to give more credit to other forms of testing and to diversify funding.”

The process of creating and testing a new drug for human use doesn’t start with animals.

When researching tumors, for example, research starts at the cellular level with tissue cultures, then successful experiments move up to mice; larger animals; terminally sick humans at low levels, with their consent; and eventually terminally sick humans at higher levels, Werner said.

Using animals for research makes the research process much more efficient, he said, and the target for most studies is humans.

Animals used for research are bred for lab testing, Vitale said.

“It’s important to use animals (for research) because there is no other replacement for a body when testing things,” Vitale said. “We’re all mammals, we all kind of function the same way — frankly, there are only minor differences.”

Research on campus

Almost every science department at MSU has at least some animal research, Werner said.

The use of animals is more rare in chemistry, unless the department is working on anti-cancer drugs or something similar, he said.

MSU’s laboratory animal program is similar to programs at other universities, Werner said. At the University of Michigan, animal research is almost exclusively in biomedicine.

Because of MSU’s extensive agriculture programs, MSU works with more large animals than other schools, Werner said.

Still, rodents account for about 95 percent of the animals used in research on campus, he said. In total, there are about 3,000 cages of rodents in various facilities around campus with each cage housing one to five rodents.

Any experiments using animals for research on campus must first be approved by the animal care committee.

For any use of animals in research or teaching, a person must describe in writing what will be done with the animal and why.

The committee requires the researcher to look for alternatives for the animals, and if the researcher has considered alternatives, the committee approves the proposal, Breedlove said. Approved proposals are valid for three years.

“The vast majority of researched animals experience no discomfort at all,” Breedlove said. “If anything is done to the animals that will cause discomfort, the committee requires the researcher to provide anesthesia or to give scientific reasons they can’t. In my experience, no one ever tries to do an experiment without giving anesthesia.”

The animal care committee also requires the proposal to explain why the researcher needs to do the experiments, to prove the experiments haven’t been done before and to state exactly what will be done during the experiments, Breedlove said.

“Our job is to assure the animals are treated as humanely as possible,” Breedlove said. “Anyone who submits a proposal, including me, 20 people’s eyes look at the proposal and always find things that need clarification or changing.”

Goldsmith said SPAR is compiling a list of reforms for the committee.

Reforms on the list include: increased transparency of the animal care committee and the university in general, increased student presence including students on the committee, student involvement in facility inspections and as well as considerations for the animal’s suffering balanced against the proposal’s advantages.

According to Goldsmith, MSU was cited twice for violations of the Animal Welfare Act, once in 2006 and once in 2007.

In 2006, 66 mink died from neglect, and in 2007, a puppy died when it fell into an unmonitored drainage hole, Goldsmith said.

“Why would this happen if researchers cared about these animals?” Goldsmith said.

Much of the animal rights activism has been positive for animal research, Werner said.

“Most polls show people are in favor of animal testing, as long as it’s done humanely and the animals are essential to use for the research,” Werner said. “That’s what I want — what researchers want.”


Article Tools:
Short URL:
http://www.statenews.com/r/3b00d3af


FEATURED CLASSIFIEDS: More classifieds »

In Employment:

In Apts. For Rent:

In Services:


Powered by Disqus

PHOTOS OF THE WEEK:More reprints »
  • Fireworks

    A firework display shimmers and shines above Cooley Law School Stadium Sunday night after the Lansing ...

  • 44119_mdh_fea_florence2_062611f.jpg

    Florence Welch, lead singer of London-based indie group Florence and the Machine, throws up a sign of ...

  • Pile of bricks

    As deconstruction of the MSC smokestack continues, bricks pile up at the foot of the once iconic MSU ...

  • Archeology

    Paige Triezenberg, a global and area studies senior, uses a small trowel to clear dirt around an animal ...

  • Carillon

    Bournville, England resident Trevor Workman plays the carillon for the first Muelder Summer Carillon ...

Available for purchase today at State News Reprints.


EVENT CALENDAR More Events »

Commentary

Add your $0.02, go to the comment form or follow the comment feed

Figures
(10/17/08 7:45am)
Report
Comment

Figures the State News would include a quote from the SPAR wackos in a nice little article about adopting unwanted hamsters.


Remember
(10/17/08 8:23am)
Report
Comment

Remember that SPAR spokesperson Drew Winter is on the staff at State News, so they will always favor that side with a new opportunity to fling accusations. Get used to it.


Anna
(10/17/08 8:46am)
Report
Comment

Way to go Erin!


Figures
(10/17/08 8:59am)
Report
Comment

Ahhhh…

That makes since. This would be why the state news publishes all of Drew’s little illogical rants.


Sean Cook
(10/17/08 12:40pm)
Report
Comment

Drew isn’t on the staff, he just writes an opinion article. He doesn’t get paid. And really, do you think that that article favored SPAR’s side? It ended with an animal researcher saying that all animal researchers want is for animals to be properly cared for, essentially saying “everything’s under control, no need to worry.” It also says that most animal rights activism is for animal testing, which obviously not true. That is definitely not favoring SPAR’s side.


Sarah
(10/17/08 3:06pm)
Report
Comment

This statement is not accurate : Rats, mice and hamsters are not covered in the Animal Welfare Act. Hamsters are covered under the AWA.


MB
(10/17/08 4:16pm)
Report
Comment

“In humans, tumors don’t start developing until a person is 40 years old or older,”

Um?


Figures
(10/17/08 4:31pm)
Report
Comment

I did not mean that the state news would take their side (I guess I implied it) I just mentioned that SPEW seems to be mentioned in an abundance of articles when their presence it not really needed.


Inquiry
(10/17/08 7:50pm)
Report
Comment

So, I heard this was going to be on the front cover on the State News, but I had trouble finding one today on campus. Was it pulled? Or did anyone else have this problem?


I work at ULAR
(10/18/08 10:32am)
Report
Comment

And I think the adoption policy needs to be in place NOW. Those hamsters are not the only instance of animals being threatened with euthanasia simply because they’re unneeded. Research is necessary, but this is just plain cruel and wasteful. I’m going to email Rob and encourage him to get the adoption policy created soon. I would ask anyone reading this to do the same, because there are animals on campus that could live great lives as pets instead of being euthanized.


Idon'tknow
(10/18/08 11:31am)
Report
Comment

My cat wants to adopt a hamster. Hmmm, maybe it would work out, I don’t know. Guess I’ll fill out an application for him, like he want’s me to do.


OMG
(10/18/08 6:51pm)
Report
Comment

I work at ULAR….. animals were being adopted out until all of this. Now the policy needs to be looked over and changed more animals are at risk now then before when they could be adopted out.


typical
(10/19/08 10:27pm)
Report
Comment

“And sometimes kids around the fraternity house get a rat and want to see if it likes beer or not.”

Somehow the Greek system always gets stereotyped for something…


Word Star
(10/20/08 11:29am)
Report
Comment

Many prominent scientists, supported by a vast amount of research, doubt the value of animal testing. Geneticist and director of Europeans for Medical Progress Kathy Archibald said researchers are “trying to create the impression that there is unanimous support in the scientific community, and that is not the case. There is enormous doubt about the testing.”

Many of the alleged advances in medical science using animal testing were failures and ended up being harmful to humans. Drug after drug is being exposed as harmful to patients even though they were not harmful to animals.

In fact, in a USDA press release January 12, 2006, Health & Human Services Secretary Mike Leavitt said:

“Currently, nine out of ten experimental drugs fail in clinical studies because we cannot accurately predict how they will behave in people based on laboratory and animal studies.”

But there is a simpler argument that testing is either morally or scientifically dubious: The animals must be a great deal like us for the results to be scientifically unproblematic, but very different from us in order to be morally unproblematic. When we want scientifically useful results, the more like us they are, the better. When we want clear consciences over causing disease, suffering, and death to innocent creatures, the more like us the animals are, the worse.

We cannot have it both ways?