Bringing about change
Obama plans for presidential staff, shapes policies
By Kelly House (Last updated: 11/05/08 11:27pm)Now that the votes have been counted and the confetti has cleared, it’s time for President-elect Barack Obama to begin contemplating the people and policies that will shape his administration. Obama began to tackle the first items of business Wednesday in several hours of meetings, during which he reportedly made calls to possible cabinet members.
Although no formal announcement was made as of press time, several media outlets reported that Obama had selected Rep. Rahm Emanuel, D-Ill., to be his chief of staff.
Emanuel is a former aide to President Bill Clinton and chairman of the Democratic caucus. His reported selection is the first in what is expected to be a slew of appointments of competent, experienced policymakers and thinkers to Obama’s cabinet, experts said.
“His emphasis is going to be on putting together the best possible administration and having those people he is selecting begin to work on the best possible plans,” said Steve Mitchell, chairman of East Lansing-based Mitchell Research and Communications Inc.
Obama announced in a written statement that former Clinton chief of staff John D. Podesta, longtime adviser Valerie Jarrett and Pete Rouse, his Senate chief of staff, will co-chair his transition team.
Mitchell said the team’s cabinet selections will include some of the nation’s best economic planners and foreign affairs specialists to deal with the nation’s most pressing issues: The economic crisis and the wars in the Middle East.
“He’s being elected to lead, and that’s the primary thing that people want right now,” he said.
Mitchell said Obama’s cabinet likely will be “as diverse as the electorate who nominated him.”
After 21 months of campaign promises, it’s likely that Obama will have to rethink and revise some of the policies he outlined in the campaign, experts said.
They said the economic crisis will make it more difficult for Obama to remold tax and expenditure policies.
“President-elect Obama will have to pick and choose,” economics professor Charles Ballard said. “That is the essence of leadership: Having to make choices, some of which are difficult.”
But which policies Obama will choose to scale back, the ones that might be axed and those that will be kept as is are anyone’s guess, Ballard said.
“It’s not an all-or-nothing thing,” Ballard said. “There’s all, there’s nothing, but there’s a whole lot of things in between.”
Ballard said Obama could attempt to fulfill his policies gradually, rather than taking immediate action. He said Obama could face pressure from the strongly Democratic Congress to enact all of his policies, but he will need to assert his authority against those voices.
“One of his hallmarks has been his ability to remain calm in difficult situations,” Ballard said. “My guess is he will proceed in a methodical path and (changes) won’t be super dramatic, but rather step-by-step.”
After his campaign oath to be a beacon of change, Americans will look to Obama to make the change he has promised, but most of them realize that it will take time, Ballard said.
“If the economy were humming smoothly along, then the public would have a greater expectation that he would be able to move forward with new initiatives,” he said.
Nutritional sciences senior Jessica Scott said she realizes not every policy will be enacted right away.
“He’ll have to evaluate the issues that are more important first, and maybe take care of those and put the others on the back burner,” she said. “But hopefully he’ll be able to eventually get to everything he promised us.”
In addition to the economy, foreign policy will be one of Obama’s top challenges in the White House.
Experts said Obama’s election will immediately improve U.S. relations abroad, but his policies will decide whether that perception remains positive in the long run.
“(The world) demands not merely a general reassessment of (America’s) policy toward the Middle East, but also a reform of those policies, or after a while, disillusion will set in,” international relations professor Mohammed Ayoob said.
Citizens of foreign nations, particularly in the Middle East, have an extremely sour opinion of President Bush. Obama will have to prove his policies are different to avoid being subject to the same opinions, Ayoob said.
To do that, he must uphold his promise to withdraw from Iraq and focus on the growing conflict in Afghanistan.
“The issues (Iraq and Afghanistan) face are primarily political and not military,” Ayoob said. “Just throwing troops at those problems is not necessarily going to solve them.”
Ayoob said Obama will have to eventually withdraw troops from both countries.
“The American presence in both countries has become much more a part of the problem than of the solution,” he said.
Originally Published: 11/05/08 11:20pm


















Stop Iran now!
11/06/08 1:02amWhen Iran nukes Israel, the blood of the Israelis will be on the hands of all the liberal Jews that stupidly voted for Obama. Its suicide!
Bleed Green
11/06/08 8:46amHire MEAN-FACED SHORT-HAIRED bureaucrats with DULL BUTTER KNIVES to “correct” the male appendages that have destroyed WOMYN since the dawn of time!!!
TUCKER MAX FOREVER!!!
http://www.tuckermax.com/
Next: Rev. GOD DAMN AMERICA lectures STUPID NAIVE WHITE PUNKS ON DOPE about “WHITEY SO CRAZY!!! TAKE HIS MONEY!!!”
post partisan
11/06/08 10:19amHe made great headway in asking Rahm “Fuck the Republicans” Emanuel to be his Chief of Staff. Cant wait for this “post partisan” style of government.
Sigh
11/06/08 10:49amOh, my! You mean a democrat picked a…GASP…DEMOCRAT to be his chief of staff?! Say it aint so! What an unexpected and bitter partisan move. What kind of president would do such a thing?
/sigh
post partisan
11/06/08 11:55amDear Sigh,
No, its not suprising that a Dem would pick a Dem. Nor is that the point. The point is that he picked a Dem who has a history of being extremely partisan and anti Rep hence his commentary a while back, “F* the Republicans”.
Do you see the difference or are you too busy blocking out any valid point?
Sigh
11/06/08 11:58amIt isn’t the Chief of Staff’s job to reach across the isle. I don’t see how Emanuel’s history is a VALID POINT concerning post partisanship.
post partisan
11/06/08 12:25pmHere is a summary of the Chief of Staff’s Job per wikipedia:
[edit] Job duties
The roles of the Chief of Staff are both managerial and advisory and can include the following duties, depending on the President’s style of conducting business:4
[edit] Managerial
Select key White House staff and supervise them
Structure the White House staff system
Control the flow of people into the Oval Office
Manage the flow of information
[edit] Advisory
Advise the President on issues of politics, policy and management issues
Protect the interests of the President
Negotiate with Congress, other member of the executive branch, and extragovernmental political groups to implement the President’s agenda
Nope…no reaching across the isle in there.
...View full comment »
Sigh
11/06/08 12:53pmYa, in order to implement the President’s agenda, bipartisan or otherwise.
Either way, I’d rather have a partisan left executive branch than partisan right, though I’m hoping it will be mostly centrist. There are key issues that need attention that would never pass under a republican (what does it even mean to be republican these days?) executive branch.
post partisan
11/06/08 1:23pmSigh,
Look at voting records and actions not rhetoric. If you are truely hoping for a centrist executive branch the appointment of Rahm Emanuel is not a good indication that will become a reality.
And in addressing key issues such as the financial crisis I think you need to do more research at which party blocked any real reform with respect to that issue.
Sigh
11/06/08 3:32pmThink what you will. I’ve done the research and have more confidence in the democrats at this moment in time.
Jonas
11/06/08 4:13pmObama and his staff (TBD) along with the likes of Reid, Pelosi, Howard Dean, etc.. I don’t anticipate any centrist, bi-partisian policies in the near term. John Kerry’s name is popping up now too. Quite the freakshow in control of Washington.
Bleed Green
11/06/08 5:46pmHussein (aka BLEED GREEN up there), if you don’t have anything to contribute, you should just stop posting. Clearly, you never do, so please spare us.
Jason Van Dyke
11/06/08 8:35pmI am interested in who he picks because I think it will say a lot about what his priorities are going to be as President. I think that it will say a great deal about just what kind of “change” we can expect from Barack Obama. I am most interested to see which magical presidential want he will wave to give a tax cut AND free health care to 95% of America while also improving the economy by getting government spending under control.
J. Edward Tremlett
11/07/08 9:51amJVD on the election, from his blog:
“Now that this is over I just want to say loudly and proudly that everyone who voted for Obama is a communist traitor undeserving of life, let alone citizenship in this country.
And anyone who is white or Christian who voted for Obama is a traitor to their race and/or their religion (as the case may be).”
I’m curious to see what magic “want” you’ll be waving to deprive life and liberty from those who voted contrary to their country and race, myself.
J. Edward Tremlett
11/07/08 9:55amand as for the “fuck the republicans” comment, we’ve had a vice president with a really salty vocabulary, in case you forgot him telling Sen. Leahy to go fuck himself on the Capitol floor?
If that’s the best reason you can find for opposing the fellow’s being in the cabinet, I suggest you dig deeper.