Saturday, March 20, 2010 | Since 1909 | East Lansing, MI Advertise | Classifieds | Puzzles | Employment | Contact Us
Feed:
Follow us on:
Mostly Cloudy, 32° F | 0° C
7 day forecast

Article Tools:

  • Share this article on Facebook
  • Digg this
  • Add to del.icio.us
  • Blogger
  • Comment feed
  • Print

Faas' column brave, reflects values of Christian society

(Last updated: 11/30/08 7:19pm)

In response to Dan Faas’ column, Love drives same-sex marriage fight (SN 11/24), I would like to lend my enthusiastic support to him. He is a model of Christian charity, as well as orthodoxy: a rare combination these days. Indeed, to stand in the truth with love is both a Gospel precept and a prevailing theme of the pontificate of my hero, Pope John Paul II. This is not easy. In a society that is increasingly tolerant of every idea and behavior except that which is explicitly Christian, proclaiming the Gospel in word and deed is always a risk.

I cannot, therefore, help but admire Faas’ courage, a virtue that has lent its name to an organization created by the late John Cardinal O’Connor of New York to minister to those who struggle with same-sex attraction. It may surprise many readers to know that there are many such souls who are committed to living chastely, according to the Gospel and the consistent and spirit-led teaching of the church.

I therefore direct the remainder of this letter to you who struggle with same-sex attraction, the homosexual community. I beg you, do not accept the lie society has fed you. Accept, rather, the fact that what Faas said is true — the rock foundation of the Christian sexual ethic is not hatred, bigotry or “homophobia.” It is love. This love is not simple, easy or “politically correct” but it is real. The fact is that there is a community of believers near you who, though they do not know you, really care about you … who love you.

They are not perfect. They would readily admit their own brokenness. But this is precisely why they can so effectively minister to your needs. They themselves have known the love and mercy — the profound healing power — of Jesus, and they wish to share this grace with you. True, He accepts us just as we are, but we never leave the same as we came. We are transformed into His own image and likeness, empowered for a love that is full, lasting and fruitful.

Ryan Joseph Delaney

English junior

Originally Published: 11/30/08 7:09pm




Commentary:

« ‹ 1 › »

America Loves You

11/30/08 7:50pm

I still fail to see how anything of this — as “loving” as it is — has anything to do with making something legal or illegal.

Wow...

11/30/08 9:37pm

Thanks Ryan! I really needed a good laugh you wonderfully talented, moronic, shortsighted wordsmith. Now quit trying to dictate policy and get back to doing whatever you English majors do.

Ken

12/01/08 9:25am

Religion is a disorder, a disease of the mind. The world would be a better place if all the religious nuts — christian, muslim, jewish, hindu, all of them — just went away. But alas, the world is too fascinated with celebrities, gossip, and war to give a moment of rational analysis of archaic beliefs like detesting homosexuality or carrying out jihad.

If you believe in an invisible man that has strict moral laws for a blob of carbon by-product on a speck of metals floating around a boring star in an average galaxy in an average galaxy group at the outer edge of faint strand in the endless cosmic web, well, you’ve been duped by people that want power.

...

View full comment »

Em

12/01/08 9:56am

wow. this is hilarious.

Real Love?

12/01/08 10:22am

I fail to follow Ryan’s logic. Who made YOU, or any of us for that matter, the final judge of other people? If you are such a devout believer, you should be able to realize that GOD judges our actions in the end, not our “holier” neighbor. You should use that judgmental energy to LOVE others instead of condemning them.

Blah

12/01/08 10:43am

In response to the last comment:

I believe that the usual “Christian” logic is to assert that the Bible — and they never stop to question the people who chose what got included in the bible 1700 years ago — is the ultimate truth, the final word from above. When asked why the Bible, and not the Koran, Torah, or any other “holy” book should be trusted more than human reason^1, they will go on about how their god is the “best” god because he’s the only one who displayed that particular love for humanity that let got himself crucified (interesting how they fall to arguing for an end) and will occasionally point to the fact that events predicted in the early parts of the Bible are fulfilled in the later parts.

...

View full comment »

Justin Lippi

12/01/08 11:17am

Whether or not gay people should live chaste, they need to be accepted as they are, as people who are romantically and sexually attracted to members of the same sex and who sometimes defy gender norms.

I do not read this in either Faas’s article, or this one. In fact, Faas states that gay people don’t see the glory in heterosexual sex, as if they can be made to see it.

Apparently the only thing you anti-gay evangelicals are actually united on is that they want to be able to stamp gay people out of existence.

And for the record, no I do not think gay people should live chaste.

...

View full comment »

I can't come up with a snarky name

12/01/08 12:35pm

‘In a society that is increasingly tolerant of every idea and behavior except that which is explicitly Christian’

Its letters like this and people like you who make me reject Christianity. Don’t blame society, blame your false sense of superiority.

Onlooker.

12/01/08 1:07pm

As a Christian myself, I constantly get fed up with the current mainstream Christianity. People display nothing but hypocrisy, judgment, and speak above others in a sense of Superiority. On that note, I am sorry you feel the way you do I can’t come up with a snarky name… and nor do I blame you. Jesus was in the world but not of the world. Grace is not being displayed by Ryan, but instead he is only pushing people further away from the Truth.

...

View full comment »

Joe

12/01/08 1:44pm

Onlooker, your question to “Blah” and “Ken” smacks of the sense of superiority you speak against. It implies that morality can only be derived by religion. I would suspect most nonreligious people would still agree it is immoral to kill or steal. This judgement can be reached without having it handed down by “God.”

Onlooker.

12/01/08 1:58pm

Joe. I Completely agree that there can still be a Universal Law of Morals. More in a sense of humanity. A non-religious person lacks obligation to any morality system (Not saying that in a negative manner)… So my apologies there. For me personally, I see it a bit differently.

Sister Christian

12/01/08 2:04pm

Blah and Ken- to ignore all of the beautiful results of the existence of religion, for people who believe in it and those who do not alike, is to claim absolute ignorance of the history of the earth. Also, to claim that religion exists without a substantial amount of reason is absurd. We do not operate out of fear, or exist out of blind faith. We instead revere God so much that we heed his commandment to love others the way that we love ourselves.

...

View full comment »

Blah

12/01/08 2:18pm

Morality is merely the set of principles on which we (attempt to) agree.

Blah

12/01/08 2:19pm

Morality is merely the set of principles on which we (attempt to) agree.

Joe

12/01/08 2:27pm

Onlooker. I fail to see how a religious person is more bound to their moral code than a nonreligious person. Please explain.

I can't come up with a snarky name

12/01/08 2:41pm

‘to ignore all of the beautiful results of the existence of religion, for people who believe in it and those who do not alike, is to claim absolute ignorance of the history of the earth’

The Crusades, the Holocaust, The Israel-Palestine conflict, September 11th: All religiously motivated…where’s the beauty?

Wow...

12/01/08 2:45pm

Joe maybe Onlooker believes that morals are exclusive to religion perhaps? It is an extremely asinine idea but no one ever said religion and logic go hand in hand.

I have a snarky name

12/01/08 3:08pm

Holocaust – how about too many jewish people were moving(ed) into an already depressed Germany taking precious supplies (i.e., land, jobs)

Israel-Palestine – One country lost land to another country. Or taken or handed. Either way, eliminate Israel and the problems go away. Either way if they don’t piss off Hitler, we don’t have this problem.

9/11 – A bunch of people don’t like they way we live, the way we bomb thier countries or put people into power in thier countries and have to come back 20 years later and take them out. Or how about supporting a country from Russian invasion, then as soon as the conflict was over, turning your back on them when they need you the most.

Onlooker.

12/01/08 3:13pm

Wow… and Joe, I did not want to present the idea that morals are exclusive to religion. The question I threw out there was how the idea of Moral Law had stemmed. My conclusion, based on religious doctrine, is all long-standing religious systems set up a similar moral code (ie: Don’t kill, steal).. In reality, Moral’s are utilitarian, really. Basic socialization requires rules. You know what, let me go back on my first comment and say that my logic was off center.

common sense

12/01/08 3:47pm

If Mother Theresa and Stalin end up in the same place after they’re six feet under, who was the idiot?

Personally I’d rather be the hedonist with the nearly justified Jehovah complex and people marching in front of giant portraits of me, but that’s just me…

Disgusted

12/01/08 4:59pm

To “I have a snarky name,” I don’t even know quite where to begin with how flawed this post is. First of all, none of the aspects of these tragedies which you point out are at all beautiful which was the claim made in an earlier post. At the very least they are justifications people have made to commit atrocities towards others. Beauty emerges in situations where communities come together to benefit all, not in an effort to defeat others.

...

View full comment »

Bill

12/01/08 8:30pm

… And the true intention of the Christian is the subjugation of homosexuals? Why don’t you religious types spend more time creating this wonderful religious beauty of which you speak and less time pushing your “truth” on others?

Anonymous

12/01/08 9:15pm

I’m so tired of this half of Christianity wasting our precious publicity taking up what is such a small issue (from a Biblical standpoint) — if it’s one at all, and I think that it’s not, but that’s not my point — when we should be talking about much more important things. Do you know how many people you drive away from the church, from the Bible, because of this?

...

View full comment »

Wow...

12/01/08 9:36pm

Wow… and Joe, I did not want to present the idea that morals are exclusive to religion. You know what, let me go back on my first comment and say that my logic was off center.

Okay, I’ll play along. Let’s look at your first post. You said and I quote “…question for you both (which does not pertain to the subject). Why should there be any moral law if no faith/religion exists?” This question does seem to imply that morality is exclusive to religion.

...

View full comment »

Onlooker.

12/01/08 10:08pm

Wow…Well spoken.

Specifically in most Religion’s, you can get rewarded in the afterlife for presenting a life of high morality. Giving reason for doing humanitarian deeds and/or doing the work of whoever you praise. That’s where I referred to the idea of lacking an obligation to a morality system (religious morality system). Regardless, morality has always had its place in society… I agree with you.


« ‹ 1 › »


PHOTOS OF THE WEEK:More reprints »
Photo courtesy of Wharton Center /

Performers in the traveling professional group Nrityagram perform their tradItional Indian dances.

Powered by reprints.statenews.com.