<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>E.L. firm looks to prove a stable state economy depends on universities - Comment Feed</title>
<link>http://www.statenews.com</link>
<description>As the state budget continues to shrink and higher education funding declines by millions, the work of a local consulting group rarely has been more crucial to Michigan universities building their case for more support.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<generator>Gryphon 2.2.3b-tsn (woodward)/Foundry5</generator>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:34:26 -0400</lastBuildDate>
<webMaster>webmaster@statenews.com</webMaster>
<item><title>Comment from WOW!</title>
<link>http://www.statenews.com/index.php/comment/view/33929</link>
<description>A study funded by UM/MSU/WSU says state needs UM/MSU/WSU.

	WOW! That&#8217;s news! Stop the presses!

	And Gov. Job-Killer really is a job-creator? OMG! Who funded that study?</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 06:37:40 -0500</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.statenews.com/index.php/comment/view/33929</guid>
</item>
<item><title>Comment from MOM!</title>
<link>http://www.statenews.com/index.php/comment/view/33983</link>
<description>What part of their methodology do you question, &#8220;WOW!&#8221;?  The data?  The math?  The assumptions?  Have you done your own calculations?  What have you found?  Benefit? Loss?  If so, how much?  

	A study stands on its own.  If it is transparent, any conflict of interest should show.  You have alleged something, fine, point it out.  A general accusation without specifics is worthless.  If you see an area where there seems to be something hidden, point that out.  

	Otherwise, don&#8217;t waste our time.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:26:20 -0500</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.statenews.com/index.php/comment/view/33983</guid>
</item>
<item><title>Comment from John</title>
<link>http://www.statenews.com/index.php/comment/view/34209</link>
<description>I love this study.  The title says it all: &#8220;looks to prove&#8221;.  As in, they want something to be true, so they are looking for evidence to back it up.  These people all just have agendas.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:34:26 -0400</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.statenews.com/index.php/comment/view/34209</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
