About 590 jobs on line in MSU budget
Tweet
About 600 MSU employees’ positions might be affected by the approximately $50 million in cuts the university is instituting during the next two years, MSU officials said. These cuts are an issue especially for nontenured faculty, who see job security as the No. 1 issue they face, said Richard Manderfield, spokesman for the organizing committee of the recently formed Union for Nontenure-Track Faculty and a visiting assistant professor of writing, rhetoric and American cultures. The reductions come as MSU prepares for a possible $9.1 million decrease in state funding, according to the budget guidelines approved Friday by the MSU Board of Trustees.
Personnel problems
In addition to the possible 10.1 percent tuition hike during the next two years, MSU will cut 10 percent in unit operating budgets. That’s 4 percent, or about $19.4 million, in 2009-10 and 6 percent in 2010-11, according to the guidelines. The 10 percent reduction represents about $50 million during the next two years.
Of that $50 million, about 87 percent is related to personnel and will affect about 590 positions. The majority, or 45 percent, of the personnel reductions will be accomplished by not filling open positions; 36 percent will be cut by not reappointing fixed-term faculty; and 19 percent will be done through layoffs.
Manderfield said the cuts are particularly stressful on nontenured faculty.
“Economic pressures fall disproportionately on nontenured faculty,” Manderfield said. “We find that to be unfair and that’s a concern of ours.”
Nontenured, or fixed-term, faculty hold an appointment for a set length of time. These appointments can be renewed, but with the cuts looming, Manderfield said concerns about job security are paramount.
“We really don’t have the (job) security of an average person,” he said. “There are people in the union who have been doing that for 20, 25 years. Their whole professional career lived out wondering if they were going to have a job again.”
Manderfield said there wasn’t much the union could do for this round of cuts, but its members hope to begin bargaining with the university in the fall.
Although the budget for 2010-11 won’t be set until next year, MSU President Lou Anna K. Simon said the university was planning ahead to give families more time to prepare.
“There is a lot of uncertainty for us and uncertainty for the state budget, but at some point you have to give families certainty,” Simon said.
Estimates project financial woes lasting into 2015, she said.
Cutting back
MSU officials are planning on a possible $9.1 million decrease in state appropriations for the upcoming year.
The decrease represents a 3.1 percent decrease from last year, which would leave state appropriations for the 2009-10 year at about $283.9 million, according to the guidelines.
MSU received about $293 million in-state appropriations for 2008-09.
MSU Trustee Faylene Owen said state appropriations have been falling for years and MSU had to adapt to the changing times.
“It was less than 20 years ago that we were getting 60 percent from the state of Michigan and we have to decide at this university what kind of university we want to be,” Owen said during the meeting.
Provost Kim Wilcox said future funding is still unknown.
“The governor, House and Senate’s recommendations are for this year’s budget, not for next year (2010-11),” he said. “There is growing concern there won’t be enough stimulus money to get us through two years. … We’re making our best guess at what the next year will be so students and families can start to plan further ahead than in the past.”
MSU has cut spending about $74 million during the past nine years, according to the guidelines.
In addition to a reduction in state funding, MSU is facing increasing utility prices. Costs for utilities in 2009-10 are estimated to increase by about 11 percent, or about $5.2 million.
Health care costs also have hit the university hard. Last year, MSU spent about $106 million — about $2 million a week — on health care and prescriptions for employees, said Brent Bowditch, assistant vice president of human resources, in May.
The guidelines include a $3.4 million increase to deal with raising health care costs for 2009-10. Costs have risen by about 150 percent during the last 10 years, according to a statement from MSU.
To help soften the blows, about 125 administrators, faculty and staff said they would donate their annual merit-based raises back to students, according to data from the Office of the Provost on Monday.
MSU ranks ninth in the Big Ten for average faculty salary, according to information from the Office of Planning and Budgets.
Wilcox spoke to the deans and vice presidents Tuesday.
Despite the cuts and the economic pressures the university is facing, Simon said MSU will pull through.
“We will approach it with an attitude that is an MSU can-do spirit,” she said during the meeting. “MSU has always been able to play the hand that it was dealt better than anyone else.”







Commentary
Add your $0.02, go to the comment form or follow the comment feed
America
(06/23/09 8:43am)Report
Looks like more TAs will be teaching classes…
MSUAlum2001
(06/23/09 12:15pm)Report
Well those who bitched about the tuition hikes, shouldn’t bitch about being taught by more TA’s.
lol
(06/23/09 12:56pm)Report
I would rather be taught by a TA, at least they explain material better and more down to earth, at least in economics.
DJJ
(06/23/09 1:40pm)Report
Good, this is a wonderful opportunity to cut all the non-tenured faculty in Mathematics and Engineering who are incompetent at communicating with their students.
DJJ
(06/23/09 1:44pm)Report
If the administration prefers, I would volunteer to produce a list of math and engineering faculty who both have insignificant levels of federal grants and who are rated by their students to be incompetent communicators.
DJJ
(06/23/09 1:52pm)Report
Lastly, don’t be surprised if you see lower faculty rushing to have the department faculty vote on their tenure. It would almost be guaranteed that illegal things had taken place for these individuals.
Sparty x2
(06/23/09 3:12pm)Report
Where is all the freaking money going??? MSU pisses away money left and right. Where is it? I get phone calls for donations every month or so… Where is it? Income from revenue sports… Where is it? Grants… Where is it? On top of all that $284 million… Where is it?? Student tuition money (over $100 million + housing)… Where is it??
Where’s the accountability? Who’s padding their pockets at the expense of others? I don’t get it, and I don’t see the justification.
Ok, revenue sports support non-revenue sports, but I would think there is far more coming in than going out. Where is it?
Go ahead MSU, figure out what you want to be before it’s too late. Maybe it’s already too late…
Jack
(06/23/09 3:59pm)Report
Spartyx2, you’d find the money if you paid attention. Donations go into the endowment to fund things like scholarships and physical plant improvements, and sports are self funded – they keep their money and the rest of the U keeps the rest of it. Grants are for research in a specific area, not for the general fund. Student money pays for food, dorm staff, heat and electricity, upkeep on buildings…
You’re welcome to file a FOIA request for the University’s books and balance sheets. Discover exactly how much “padding” there is. In the mean time, I’ll spend my time trying to keep my damn job.
Ed T
(06/23/09 8:00pm)Report
As I see it, MSU has 3 core missions (in order of importance):
1. Producing research
2. Educating graduate and professional students
3. Educating undergraduate students
Everything that contributes directly to these missions should be prioritized; anything that doesn’t should be seen as expendable.
Simple enough …
Tony B
(06/23/09 10:20pm)Report
Ed T, I don’t know, but I would guess that revenue is generated by your 3 items in exactly the reverse order.
Ed T
(06/24/09 4:11am)Report
Tony —
I would guess MSU does bring in more money from undergrad tuition than through research grants. But every university that aspires to national (or international) prominence prioritizes research over education, and, in my opinion, that’s a good thing.
Besides, research done at MSU also benefits our undergrads, because the more prominent MSU becomes, the more valuable an MSU Bachelors degree becomes — especially for students who want to work in another state, or another country.
Sparty x2
(06/24/09 10:30am)Report
Jack, thank you for your honest response. You touched on the point I was trying to make in that with research money coming in, donations coming in, sports self funded and then some, housing covered by student fees, where is the $285 million + student tuition money going?
DJJ
(06/24/09 3:49pm)Report
The Athletics Department is not self funding! In the late 1980s MSU took out a $10 million bond to help pay for the Jack Breslin Student Events Center. Today, the debt service is commingled in the university general funds. YOUR TUITION DOLLARS PAY FOR A BASKETBALL VENUE!
hvt
(06/24/09 8:17pm)Report
It’s true that stories like this always tend to highlight those who might be most negatively affected. But where is the scrutiny of MSU’s program choices ? Is MSU Dubai really a necessity? Why was it important to start it in times of tightening budgets? Are all of MSU’s departments important and vital to the school’s mission to educate it’s people and contribute to improving the state’s economy? Low enrollment programs should be scrutinized and many should probably be discontinued. Somehow there always seems to be the presumption that everything the university is doing must continue, and more must be added to serve the unmet needs. This attitude has got to change. Tough program decisions need to be made.
WAT
(06/25/09 10:01pm)Report
WHAT the hell is MSU researching…. having a freakin super conducting cyclotron….we’re crushing atoms….what a complete waste of money!!