Sunday February 12, 2012 | Since 1909 | East Lansing, MI Advertise | Classifieds | Puzzles | Employment | Contact Us | Subscriptions
Feed:
Follow us on:
Clear, 24° F | -4° C
7 day forecast

At the Capitol crossroads

By Abby Lubbers and Meredith Skrzypczak Originally Published: 09/24/09 11:48pm Modified: 09/27/09 11:39pm 2 comments

SPC_FEA_LansingCapitolBuilding_092409
Sean Cook The State News Reprints

In the twilight, the state Capitol building sits as legislators try and figure out how to balance the state’s $40 billion budget in the coming days. Scholarships and stimulus funding are among some of the issues.


The Michigan Promise Scholarship might not go up in smoke because of a bill submitted Thursday by the state House Appropriations Committee and MSU could receive $7 million in stimulus funds, if two plans working their way through the state government are approved.

The scholarship, which provides more than 7,700 MSU students and 96,000 students statewide with up to $4,000 for college, could be saved by generating about $98 million in taxes.

The $120 million needed to keep the state’s promise in the next fiscal year could be funded by tightening tax loopholes and extending a tax to pop and bottled water. The tax plans were suggested by Rep. George Cushingberry, D-Detroit, who chaired the House committee, and are not listed in the House bill, said Griffin Rivers, Cushingberry’s chief of staff.

The $7 million in stimulus funding could ease tuition increases, fund financial aid or some combination of both, MSU officials said. The money would come from the state through funds in President Barack Obama’s American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

“They’re designed to help institutions boost their operational budgets,” said Paul Hassen, spokesman for the Association of Public and Land-Grant Universities.

State deliberations

The fate of the Michigan Promise Scholarship will be tested when the House bill reaches the Republican-controlled Senate.

“If the Democrats hold fast, it will come out of the House, but we don’t know about the Senate,” Rivers said.

A higher education conference committee comprised of both senators and representatives voted Wednesday to eliminate the scholarship along with another $60 million in cuts to financial aid. Thurday’s House bill remedied the cut by adding another piece of legislation that provided $120 million in funding for the scholarship.

Legislators are working to meet an Oct. 1 deadline to balance the state budget to avoid a government shutdown. The budget, which totals about $40 billion, faces a $2.7 billion shortfall.

Gov. Jennifer Granholm has fought to keep the scholarship while the Senate has proposed eliminating the program altogether.

House Republicans suggested keeping it at 2009 funding levels. Cutting it would trim about $140 million from the state budget.

Those opposed to funding the reinstated $120 million grant said the problem with the appropriation committee bill is how the money might be raised.

“If (Cushingberry) doesn’t have a funding source, I don’t see how this could pass,” said Rep. Dave Agema, R-Grandville.

But that does not necessarily mean the grant will be eliminated, Agema said. Figuring out where the money comes from must be a priority, he added.

And some Senators share the same concerns, said Matt Marsden, spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Mike Bishop, R-Rochester.

“Where are they going to get the money?,” he said. “There is no $120 million to budget in.”

When there is more money, Bishop plans to introduce legislation to reinstate the scholarship. But until that happens, promises can’t be kept, Marsden said.

If the state can’t figure out how to balance the budget, MSU students and the university might hang in the balance until a decision is reached.

Journalism sophomore Sam Meux said she took the Michigan Merit Exam and deserves her money.

“If the government is going to promise scholarship money for doing well and then take it away whenever they feel like it, there was no point in me taking the exam in the first place,” she said.

If the scholarship isn’t funded by the state, the university will have to figure out how to fill in the gaps left by the missing funds, MSU Board of Trustees member Colleen McNamara said.

“If the scholarships don’t come through, we’ll have huge issues around scholarships and affordability,” she said.

“I have no doubt we’ll have a very serious discussion about putting more money into financial aid.”

Stimulating students, MSU

If MSU receives the proposed $7 million in stimulus funding from the state, MSU has three possible plans as to how it could be used. According to MSU budget guidelines, if stimulus money is received in the general fund, the funds could be allocated to lessen the 2009-10 tuition increase. The funds also could be used to mitigate any reduction in Michigan’s financial aid, or a combination of easing the tuition increase or the reduction in financial aid.

But officials are uncertain if they’ll get the money or if they’d have to use it for something else. There might be preliminary plans, but there is no clear guideline for how it could be used.

“Everything is up in the air,” McNamara said.

The MSU Board of Trustees decided in May that students could see as much as a 10.1 percent increase in tuition during the next two years, to fit with 2009-10 university budget guidelines.

MSU officials said if the university receives federal stimulus money, the increase could be reduced to about 2.5 to 3 percent for in-state undergraduates.

Although an extra $7 million for the university would be helpful, it would not represent a long-term fix, Hassen said.

“This is very definitely a short-term fix,” he said. “This is a one-time handout to the colleges through the governor’s office.”

If the university receives the funds, officials will have to manage it wisely, MSU Trustee Donald Nugent said.

“There’s no question $7 million is going to be very helpful to the university and will help this year,” he said. “If it’s not recurring then next year we’re going to just be short that much more.”

Students might receive refunds, depending on how the stimulus money is used if the university is allocated the funds. This could help offset the $9 million cut the university was facing for its operating budget.

“My perception is that (the stimulus money) will be part of the general fund,” McNamara said.

“I don’t think it has any earmarks that we’re required to spend it for anything.”

Any refund would not be immediately sent to students, Nugent said.

“Even though it’s ordered doesn’t mean the money’s in the bank today,” he said.

“We can’t just say we got $7 million and everybody’s going to get a check for $1,000.”

MSU spokesman Terry Denbow said all decisions on the allocation of stimulus funds have yet to be determined.

“I think we’re evaluating those alternatives and probably will not make a final decision until we assess and know a lot more about the state’s commitment to financial aid,” he said.

The stimulus dollars are ultimately meant to help students, Hassen said.

“(They’re designed) with the idea of trying to just provide the funds necessary so that with this economic turmoil that’s going on, the institutions don’t pass on additional budget cuts to the student in the form of higher tuition,” he said.

As the university experiences changes because of tight budgets, MSU officials will do what they can to lighten the load for students, Nugent said.

“Anything we can do to keep education more affordable for students … the president, the board and her staff are absolutely committed.”


Article Tools:
Short URL:
http://www.statenews.com/r/b732f5e1


FEATURED CLASSIFIEDS: More classifieds »

In Employment:

In Apts. For Rent:

In Services:


Powered by Disqus

PHOTOS OF THE WEEK:More reprints »
  • Fireworks

    A firework display shimmers and shines above Cooley Law School Stadium Sunday night after the Lansing ...

  • 44119_mdh_fea_florence2_062611f.jpg

    Florence Welch, lead singer of London-based indie group Florence and the Machine, throws up a sign of ...

  • Pile of bricks

    As deconstruction of the MSC smokestack continues, bricks pile up at the foot of the once iconic MSU ...

  • Archeology

    Paige Triezenberg, a global and area studies senior, uses a small trowel to clear dirt around an animal ...

  • Carillon

    Bournville, England resident Trevor Workman plays the carillon for the first Muelder Summer Carillon ...

Available for purchase today at State News Reprints.


EVENT CALENDAR More Events »

Commentary

Add your $0.02, go to the comment form or follow the comment feed

Dan Jakeway
(09/25/09 1:10pm)
Report
Comment

This story is ludicrously slanted, it blames House and Senate Republicans. Newsflash, the Wednesday conference committee that threw out the Promise scholarships was bipartisan comprised of the Senate majority Republicans and House majority Democrats. The House Appropriations Committee Chairman George Cushingberry is just grandstanding like he did in Summer 2007 arguing for a huge state income tax increase.

The Republican Senate passed a balanced budget a month ago without tax increases. The Democratic House has produced…nothing. They play this childish game like they did two years ago to force tax increases during a statewide economic depression with unemployment above 15%.

Here’s an idea, why doesn’t the state government retain federal withholding schedules and the State Legislature can decide how much they want to “invest” in Washington, D.C. or retain for purposes of the sovereignty of the State of michigan.


Chip
(09/25/09 3:04pm)
Report
Comment

When the Promise Award (formerly the Merit Award) began it was a scholarship of $2,000 that could be enhanced by an additional $500 if the student had done well on the middle school MEAP test as well as the High School Proficiency Test. This was introduced during the Engler administration and was primarily used to leverage all high school students to take the state assessments. At that time many of the bigger and more affluent schools had a very small percentage of students who actually sat for these tests. That was a problem for the MDE and the Engler administration. How could they develop a test that could be used to monitor schools and students in terms of the mastery of state curriculum if students, especially in our better schools, weren’t willing to take the test. The solution was to throw money at the people taking the tests; people tend to like money, and sometimes change their behavior and/or attitudes when they are offerred money.
After making this little adjustment to the program, it was relatively easy to begin to add sanctions for the schools whose students did not score well on the tests.

The name changed and the dollar amount grew under Granholm, but the same purposes are served.

It would be a very bitter pill to swallow if the Promise Award is not funded, but it is important to remember that the original intent of this scholarship program was very different that what is being stated now.