True freedom needs everyone to be free
(Last updated: 09/17/09 11:03pm)I completely agree with journalism professor Fred Fico that words such as “diversity,” “multiculturalism” and “cultural relativism” shouldn’t be used.
Kris Turner
In fact, it’s my hope that we can eliminate these words from our daily lives. But that dream is a long time coming.
In a letter to the editor Conservative faculty seek to protect America’s freedom (SN 9/4), Fico argues freedom is under attack because of diversity and university speech codes, which prohibit things such as hate speeches. It’s funny that he thinks it’s OK for people to spew hate. In fact, it’s even funnier that he thinks freedom is under attack by promoting a tolerant society.
We don’t live in a time where we can simply say society is one and everyone is free. There is a lot of hate, discrimination and blatant inequality in this land of the free. I’m an openly gay man and I can say America isn’t such a great place for freedom, at least if you’re a minority.
President Barack Obama might be a person of mixed race, which is a huge step for this country, but we still have a long way to go. It’s time that every person not only says it’s great we live in a diverse society, but truly embodies those values. Tolerance is a lesson we can better learn.
Fico also writes about individual rights in regard to diversity. He states: “In effect, individuals have no rights; indeed, the idea of freedom is grounded in individual rights that have no meaning in the context of multiculturalism or cultural relativism.”
This couldn’t be further from the truth. Individual rights only can be achieved by fighting for what you deserve with others like you.
I don’t have the same rights as the person sitting next to me as I write this column. That doesn’t make me feel good. Every day I’m reminded that in the United States, I’m a second-class citizen. My right to be married and live my life with a committed partner doesn’t exist in most places. It limits the places I’d like to live after graduation. Am I free? I don’t think so.
Maybe Fico doesn’t know what it’s like to be a part of a group in society that’s treated much differently than the rest. He’s probably never gotten “the look” when going about something so routine in a day that you are flabbergasted.
Before fall semester started, my boyfriend and I took a trip around the Lower Peninsula of Michigan. We camped, cooked over fires and spent time walking along the beaches. A good vacation overall.
But one thing that struck me as odd was the way people would look at us as we shopped in a grocery store or went to dinner. The look said, “you are different, you don’t belong and you are not normal.” Late one night, over a fire, I asked my boyfriend if he ever noticed “the look.” He said he did and that it’s something we probably will have to deal with. Again, a good dose of tolerance could help remedy this problem.
Tolerance is not a veiled liberal ideology. It’s a way to promote the open and free lives of all people. When Fico writes tolerance has morphed into a way for faculty at the university to spread their political ideals, he’s wrong. Dead wrong. Tolerance is necessary so that people can learn to live in harmony with one another.
It doesn’t mean you have to love everyone, but it means you treat a person with dignity, no matter their sexual orientation, skin color, background, economic status or creed. Without it, we’d be living in a society made of people who don’t take the time to appreciate those who are different from them.
Fico also states that majority rules in his letter, which could not be more misguided. Just because slavery was an accepted institution in the past didn’t make it right. So what if some people make up a majority? That doesn’t mean I or anyone else deserves fewer rights than them.
The thought that this is an accepted ground rule is absurd. His logic is that of an old, privileged man who doesn’t know the sting of discrimination and inequality.
In fact, he’s somewhat of a hypocrite. Saying he’s defending freedom by masking his beliefs behind conservative ideology is an easy way to spout hate speech and discrimination. He does the very thing he accuses other faculty at this university of doing. I, and everyone else, can read between the lines.
If you really care about freedom and making America a better place, I challenge you to stand with minorities and demand they have equality in society. Make the “tolerance” and “diversity” you detest a thing of the past by helping to make society a level playing field for all. Only then will these words not be necessary.
Kris Turner is the State News deputy managing editor. Reach him at turne112@msu.edu.
Originally Published: 09/17/09 7:14pm















Love Ur Blue Eyes
09/18/09 7:01pmYou’re gay? I couldn’t tell from the feminine picture you provided for your columns.
Living with the freedom to speak also means that you have to let other speak as well. You don’t have to listen or agree but they have every right to spew hate in the same venues as you have to spew love.
Conservative
09/18/09 7:07pmKris, do not try and throw out the terms “liberal” and “conservative” in this argument. A true conservative (i.e. Libertarian) agrees with your right to be gay and to marry another man.
Conservatism is not about being a Christian and thumping a bible when legislating. It’s about making sure the government stays within its Constitutional bounds and does not affect how you live your life. No where in the Constitution does it say that the government has a right to tell people who they can marry. In all regards it does not affect me one bit so marry whoever you want.
I am a conservative who may give you “the look” you speak of but would never deny you your rights as a human being.
anon
09/21/09 5:33pmKris, Have you ever given another human being a dirty look because you personally disapproved of something about them? Perhaps you returned some of the looks you were given. If so, then who are you to judge others? Who’s the hypocrite?
MSU Alum
09/22/09 10:12pmI was truly disturbed that a professor in a University could write such a banal, cliched editorial. There are some good arguments that can be made against speech codes, but he didn’t touch of them.
Sursum Corda
09/23/09 12:01pmI think you misunderstand Prof. Fico’s argument. He means that rights are grounded in objective truth as it pertains to the human person. When this objective truth is undermined by such ideas as cultural relativism (the idea that moral claims are only true relative to one’s culture), rights too are undermined.
Take, for example, your own case. Let us assume, for the sake of argument, that gay men and women do in fact have the right to marry.
...View full comment »