MSU will not implement more Friday classes in '10
By Heather Guenther (Last updated: 10/06/09 11:33pm)Plans to add more Friday classes to students’ schedules next fall are on hold.
Wilcox
Provost Kim Wilcox announced Tuesday at an Executive Committee of Academic Council meeting that a scheduling change for classes held on Mondays and Wednesdays would not be implemented next year.
Officials previously said the move to shorten class times and add an extra meeting day on Friday would begin next fall. Wilcox said the move was meant to reduce scheduling conflicts for students.
“I have not changed my mind,” he said. “I just agreed we will spend more time discussing the current policy.”
University officials adopted the Monday, Wednesday and Friday schedule as the university’s standard scheduling procedure more than a decade ago, but Wilcox said exceptions to the procedure led to a large number of classes meeting only on Mondays and Wednesdays.
“Things will look like last year,” Wilcox said at the meeting. “I think that’s a regret. I think it’s unfortunate for the campus, personally. But that’s how it will be.”
On Monday, Wilcox notified the Office of the Registrar to abandon plans to schedule classes previously held on Mondays and Wednesdays to include a third session on Friday.
ECAC Chairman Harold Hughes said Senior Associate Provost June Youatt apologized to faculty members at a Sept. 29 ECAC meeting for how the university notified people about the schedule changes. The special ECAC meeting was held in response to faculty concerns about not being included in the decision to increase Friday classes and how it could affect faulty research, Hughes said.
“Dr. Youatt sat here and apologized for the way it was handled, which was not appropriate in her opinion and in my opinion and in most people’s opinion,” Hughes said. “This year, the registrar will accept things the way it has been the last few years. After that, we will have the appropriate conversations and a decision will be made.”
Wilcox said although he will listen to community concerns about the schedule, a longer wait to implement the change could impact more student schedules.
“This is all about facilitating student access to classes,” Wilcox said. “The more we vary from this standard schedule, the more conflicts we have. That’s the reality.”
Richard Weber, an associate professor of accounting and information systems, said he hopes a decision will be made after each side is able to voice its concerns.
“There’s the other issue, some of which the provost raised, and there are the other issues that the faculty have raised that didn’t appear to have been considered by the provost,” Weber said. “We’ll get those all considered over the next year and hopefully get a rational decision made out of it.”
ECAC will consider how to include students and faculty in the schedule discussion at its next meeting scheduled for Nov. 3.
Originally Published: 10/06/09 11:16pm















Soo...
10/06/09 11:44pmWas there a survey done of students? I highly doubt Wilcox suddenly woke up one day and said “MORE FRIDAY CLASSES! NOW!”
What’s the impetus behind this change, besides the one “flexible scheduling” mantra that was tired from the second it was said?
student
10/07/09 12:02amThis is not an academic decision but an administrative one which I support because it leads to savings for MSU and less impact on my tuition.
OldTimer
10/07/09 4:30amMSU used to teach 44 weeks a year: 10 class weeks plus finals, four terms a year, which included a fairly full summer schedule. 44 weeks times 5 days makes 220 days.
The present two-semester calendar (summer offerings are now quite limited) has about 16 weeks times two semesters, maybe 32 weeks. OK, say you stay home most Fridays, then 32 times four is 128 class days, more or less.
Compare this to the “real” world, where workers show up about 250 days a year.
Yes, I know that research and grad studies go on more or less constantly.
...View full comment »
Erin
10/07/09 8:28amMore times meeting in class means more time wasted walking to and from classes, not less. It also means more “class time” wasted getting everyone settled, and time wasted when a professor is interrupted by someone showing up late (in small classes). And I’ve yet to see anyone buck up the claim that this will save money except for this fantasy argument that this will allow you to graduate sooner.
...View full comment »
we get it
10/07/09 9:27amErin. Will you stop complaining about it now?
uhater
10/07/09 9:27amI think it look likes this one http://rapid4me.com/
SWEEEET
10/07/09 11:46amThere is no way that extra Friday classes reflects the will of the student body. Couldn’t they take a poll at the very least? I’m very glad they are holding off on this and hopefully it never comes up again. VIVA LA THIRSTY THURSDAY!
MSU Alumnus
10/07/09 6:11pmI’ve read a lot of comments and agree that the core problem (if it happens) is the breaking up of classes that are already scheduled into two hour blocks. For example, a 4 credit hour class that goes Monday and Wednesday for two hours or Tuesday and Thursday for two hours is much more effective from an academic standpoint than a class that lasts 50 minutes, where 10 minutes are dedicated to getting started and another 10 to winding down.
...View full comment »