Friday February 3, 2012 | Since 1909 | East Lansing, MI Advertise | Classifieds | Puzzles | Employment | Contact Us | Subscriptions
Feed:
Follow us on:
Clear, 34° F | 1° C
7 day forecast

Stem cell opponents defying voters' will

Originally Published: 10/19/09 9:04pm Modified: 10/19/09 9:04pm 9 comments

**Ryan Dinkgrave**

Ryan Dinkgrave

Last fall, Michigan voters approved Proposal 2, which lifted harsh and outdated restrictions on stem cell research and provided for strict ethical guidance. This was a major victory for the millions who could benefit from new treatments and cures to some of the worst chronic illnesses, as well as for the medical and related sciences research for communities in our state.

The voter referendum almost immediately was followed by announcements of major investments in this research in our state, at a time when diversifying and invigorating our state’s battered economy is more important than ever.

Voters also elected President Barack Obama as president of the United States that day. Among Obama’s campaign promises was an overturning of President George W. Bush’s effective ban on federal funding for embryonic stem cell research. Obama made good on that promise earlier this year, triggering further investments in such research both here in Michigan and across the nation.

Although most of the state celebrated Michigan joining the ranks of other states that have eliminated misguided and outdated legislation on such research from their books, those who opposed the proposal had some time to reflect on their failed campaign.

From the beginning, the effort was at best misleading, and at worst loaded with outright lies and fearmongering, and it appropriately drew both local and national criticism for its tactics. Although nobody tends to flinch when a group such as Right to Life Michigan pays for such dramatic moves, the Michigan Catholic Conference and its related groups had to explain the millions of dollars of their supporters’ money they wasted on the effort.

Now some of these same opponents are trying to convince the state Legislature that it should add some new harsh restrictions to the voter-approved measure. Unfortunately, the groups have not learned from their past ways and are again pushing a questionable effort in support of restrictions on what they misleadingly call “embryo research.”

Such fringe groups certainly will be shouting loud, because at this time next year, Michigan will be host to the nonprofit Genetic Policy Institute’s World Stem Cell Summit. In recognition of the efforts of Michigan citizens to pass Proposal 2, and investments and accomplishments in such research in Michigan, the GPI is bringing the world’s leading stem cell researchers, policy experts, philanthropists, advocates and educators together in Detroit.

The Summit will take place in Detroit’s Renaissance Center, the headquarters of General Motors, with TechTown, the buzzing business incubator host to several stem cell research-related firms, a few blocks away in the background.

As Detroit, the state of Michigan and much of the Midwest struggle to redefine themselves and their economies, investments in advanced scientific research in pursuit of life-saving cures are helping to turn the tide. In that regard, it would be quite fitting if our sense of innovation and ingenuity that birthed the automobile and reared the middle class would cure chronic diseases and improve lives around the world.

Today, though, we are relatively at the beginning of this journey of reinvention and scientific discovery. Recent political and policy achievements have allowed Michigan a chance to compete in these emerging industries, and these efforts are being rewarded with major investment and international attention, but it will take a commitment of the people in this state to keep up the momentum.

As long as we continue to value the saving of human lives through intelligent and ethical research and do not allow ourselves to be misguided by those who are unclear about their facts and actual agendas, we can see the sciences helping to lead our state into a healthy and prosperous future.

Ryan Dinkgrave is a State News guest columnist and public relations graduate student. Reach him at dinkgrave@gmail.com.


Article Tools:
Short URL:
http://www.statenews.com/r/b2627af6


FEATURED CLASSIFIEDS: More classifieds »

In Employment:



PHOTOS OF THE WEEK:More reprints »
  • Fireworks

    A firework display shimmers and shines above Cooley Law School Stadium Sunday night after the Lansing ...

  • 44119_mdh_fea_florence2_062611f.jpg

    Florence Welch, lead singer of London-based indie group Florence and the Machine, throws up a sign of ...

  • Pile of bricks

    As deconstruction of the MSC smokestack continues, bricks pile up at the foot of the once iconic MSU ...

  • Archeology

    Paige Triezenberg, a global and area studies senior, uses a small trowel to clear dirt around an animal ...

  • Carillon

    Bournville, England resident Trevor Workman plays the carillon for the first Muelder Summer Carillon ...

Available for purchase today at State News Reprints.


EVENT CALENDAR More Events »

Commentary

Add your $0.02, go to the comment form or follow the comment feed

Ryan Dinkgrave
(10/20/09 12:44am)
Report
Comment

The last line of the first paragraph should read:

This was a major victory for the millions who could benefit from new treatments and cures to some of the worst chronic illnesses, as well as for the medical and related sciences research communities in our state.


Definition
(10/20/09 9:32am)
Report
Comment

“on what they misleadingly call “embryo research.” “

Regardless of their motive for doing so, how is this “misleading”? The research that was legalized by Prop2 was embryonic stem cells, which, obviously, require an embryo, thereby being, by definition, contained under the term embryo research.
Adult stem cells were always legal so prop 2 was only needed to legalize embryo research.


matt
(10/20/09 2:04pm)
Report
Comment

The will of the majority is really irrelevant when this is framed as an ethical issue.


Pro-Hater
(10/20/09 3:01pm)
Report
Comment

stem cell research is fine by itself.

the problem is idealogs are deceitfully using it as a vehicle to promote abortion, in general, and loosen abortion restrictions.

so the problem with the stem cell debate is one side is being intellectually dishonest.


Really?
(10/20/09 5:09pm)
Report
Comment

I didn’t realize that 48% of Michigan voting for something made them a “fringe group”.


Ryan Dinkgrave
(10/20/09 6:38pm)
Report
Comment

The notion that supporters of stem cell research such as myself, are doing so because they wish to “promote abortion” is sick and twisted. I want to see diabetes and other diseases cured – this has absolutely nothing to do with abortion. Nothing at all.


Sursum Corda
(10/21/09 11:49am)
Report
Comment

Mr. Dinkgrave, it is not enough to simply call restrictions on embryonic stem cell research “outdated.” The age inwhich we live has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not human beings have the right to life. And this is precicely the question, whether or not human beings are any less deserving of the right to life in the embryonic stage than in later stages of development. If not, then there is no use appealing to “voters’ will,” as embryo-destructive research is inherently evil. It was once the voters’ will in this country to uphold slavery. Did that make it moral? You are evading the real question.


Eaton Beaver, Sr.
(10/21/09 2:29pm)
Report
Comment

Facebook User is either lying or simply uninformed.

The stem cell research proponents on Capitol Hill are such primarily to push less strict abortion laws through Congress. Stem Cell Research is the vehicle that pro-abortion zealots are using. In the main stream, it has everything to do with abortion. To them, the disease cures are mere ancillary benifits.

On it’s face, stem cell research is good for society. But it has to be properly regulated and separated from abortion.


NP
(10/21/09 5:08pm)
Report
Comment

Yes, because it is so much easier for stem cell research to take an embryo from the womb then to go to a fertility clinic and use the excess embryos that they would have just destroyed or kept them frozen.

I guess fertility clinics are inherently evil because knowingly kill the majority of the embryos they create to get one successful pregnancy.