Wednesday February 8, 2012 | Since 1909 | East Lansing, MI Advertise | Classifieds | Puzzles | Employment | Contact Us | Subscriptions
Feed:
Follow us on:
Clear, 33° F | 1° C
7 day forecast

Mich. Legislature working on reducing overdraft fees

By Marissa Cumbers Originally Published: 11/23/09 9:07pm 1 comment

Black Friday might be a little brighter during future holiday shopping seasons if legislation to protect consumers from excessive overdraft fees makes it through the Michigan Legislature.

Sen. Gretchen Whitmer, D-East Lansing, is developing legislation that would reduce overdraft fees and prevent multiple overdraft fees in a 24-hour period.

Overdraft fees occur when banks charge customers penalty fees when customers make purchases with debit and ATM cards even if there are insufficient funds in the customer’s account.

Whitmer’s legislation also would eliminate overdraft manipulation by requiring banks to process smaller overdraft charges before larger charges and require banks to tell consumers how overdraft fees are
calculated.

Similar legislation was proposed by the U.S. Senate Banking Committee earlier this month, and Tom Lenard, a spokesman for the Michigan Senate Democrats, said state-level movement on this issue is necessary, as well.

“As this debate continues nationally, we want to make sure that Michigan is a leader in trying to protect consumers,” he said. “We are hoping that there will be more opportunities for states to have a (voice) in regulating some financial services.”

The federal measures, proposed by U.S. Senate Banking Committee Chairman Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., would give customers the option of participating in overdraft programs and regulate excessive overdraft charges. But the state measures aim more at creating transparency and ending overdraft manipulation among Michigan-chartered banks, Lenard said.

Michigan-chartered banks are community-based banks such as Summit Community Bank, 1600 Abbot Road.

“I’m not all that surprised that there is movement at both the state and federal level,” economics professor Charles Ballard said. “People have ended up paying charges because they didn’t know their balance. This has caused … an outrage among consumers and political leaders.”

In 2008, overdraft fees cost consumers more than $576 million in Michigan and about $23.7 billion nationwide, according to a press release from Whitmer.

MSU Federal Credit Union is a federally chartered credit union, so the statewide legislation would not affect its policies, said Joyce Banish, vice president of university and community public relations for MSUFCU.

“Our disclosures are quite explanatory so there will not be any changes,” she said. “It’s important that if a student or anyone is carrying a debit card (they) are aware of not spending more than what is in their account.”

MSUFCU charges a $25 insufficient fund fee if a customer doesn’t have overdraft protection, or if the customer’s other accounts are empty, Banish said.

“It seems like you are hearing more and more people having a lot of overdraft fees, especially if they are not aware,” said state Rep. Kim Meltzer, R-Clinton Township. “Sometimes it snowballs because of a bunch of small checks and … all of those small checks get overdraft fees.”

The legislation would prevent this “snowball” effect because it requires banks to process smaller charges before higher charges. Higher charges often drain an account and can lead to multiple overdraft charges for subsequent smaller transactions.

Anthropology freshman Dillon Kuiava said the laws would create needed transparency between consumers and banks.

“I’ve had issues where the way they presented the overdraft fees were not very clear,” he said. “As a result, I’ve had to pay over $100 (in fees).”


Article Tools:
Short URL:
http://www.statenews.com/r/50eca4dd


FEATURED CLASSIFIEDS: More classifieds »

In Employment:

In Services:



PHOTOS OF THE WEEK:More reprints »
  • Fireworks

    A firework display shimmers and shines above Cooley Law School Stadium Sunday night after the Lansing ...

  • 44119_mdh_fea_florence2_062611f.jpg

    Florence Welch, lead singer of London-based indie group Florence and the Machine, throws up a sign of ...

  • Pile of bricks

    As deconstruction of the MSC smokestack continues, bricks pile up at the foot of the once iconic MSU ...

  • Archeology

    Paige Triezenberg, a global and area studies senior, uses a small trowel to clear dirt around an animal ...

  • Carillon

    Bournville, England resident Trevor Workman plays the carillon for the first Muelder Summer Carillon ...

Available for purchase today at State News Reprints.


EVENT CALENDAR More Events »

Commentary

Add your $0.02, go to the comment form or follow the comment feed

Attorney Peter N. Wasylyk
(11/23/09 9:20pm)
Report
Comment

Why is the Federal Reserve Deregulating Banks by Removing the Consumer Protections in the Truth in Lending Act from Application to Bank Overdraft Plans at the Same Time that Congress is Proposing Strengthening Consumer Protections in Bank Overdraft Plans?

On Thursday November 12, 2009 the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve adopted a new regulation and issued a new Official Staff Commentary relating to bank overdraft fees. The regulation is about 93 pages in length and has the appearance of a consumer friendly regulation that has a provision that as of July 1, 2010 consumers must affirmatively opt-in to overdraft protection plans. However, I believe that even this attempted consumer friendly provision does not go far enough in that it does not apply until July 1, 2010. Given the recent history of the banks in raising credit card interest rates before the effective date of the new federal law providing enhanced consumer protections for credit card consumers, one can only be suspect that banks will use this time before the July 1, 2010 effective date to continue to harm the interests of consumers. The regulation does not provide substantive protections to consumers, but rather to the contrary contains a provision buried in the fine print that deregulates bank overdraft protection plans by removing the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) from application to overdraft plans. This untimely deregulation of banks with respect to overdraft plans is arguably the most damaging provision of the regulation and eviscerates any vestiges of consumer protections for those who have already been affected and for those who will be affected in the future by bank overdraft plans. Not only are there no safeguards for consumers, the interpretation by the Federal Reserve that makes TILA inapplicable enables banks to continue to perpetuate unfair practices with impunity.

Attorney Peter N. Wasylyk, 1307 Chalkstone Avenue, Providence, RI 02908
Tel: 401-831-7730
Fax: 401-861-6064
E-Mail: pnwlaw@aol.com