MSU College democrats call for student action on Promise
(Last updated: 11/17/09 7:26pm)In order to save Michigan’s future, we need all hands on deck.
Right now, Lansing politicians are like a crew navigating a ship toward an iceberg — and we are on a collision course heading toward catastrophe. Michigan is going to be in grave danger if we don’t start making a commitment to our students, who ultimately will be tasked with leading our state in the future. Over time, that includes supporting and funding higher education. Right now, that means reinstating the Michigan Promise Scholarship.
Gov. Jennifer Granholm is on campus today urging the state Senate Republican leadership to act and reinstate the Promise Scholarship; we need to join her efforts. Every student during the next week needs to contact his or her state Senator and urge them to fund the Promise Scholarship and our future.
The Michigan Promise Scholarship, the first universal college scholarship, sends a message to every student that he or she must continue their education to be successful in a 21st century economy. More than 96,000 students counted on the Promise to help pay for college this year alone. That was until it was cut this year by the Legislature as a way to balance the budget. Even though it has been eliminated, the fight is not over; we must keep our Promise to those students and our commitment to Michigan’s future by reinstating funding for the Promise.
The elimination of the Promise Scholarship isn’t the only cut to education. In fact, during the past 30 years, funding for public universities significantly has declined. In 1977, state appropriations for public universities stood at 64.6 percent of the total general fund revenue; today, they stand below 30 percent. This year alone, appropriations for the 15 public universities were reduced by $43.9 million, on top of cuts to work study programs, financial aid and the Promise Scholarship. During that same period of time, tuition prices have skyrocketed in an attempt to pay for the gap left from dwindling state appropriations.
I don’t know about you, but I don’t think Lansing is representing the best interests of students. When will our legislators realize that we are Michigan’s future? We are at a crucial point in our history, and we can’t afford to balance our budget woes on the backs of students any longer. We have ‘paid the piper,’ suffering through countless tuition increases, rising book prices and swelling living expenses. When we thought it couldn’t get any worse, Lansing politicians slashed the Promise scholarship for 8,600 MSU students.
Enough is enough. Students should not settle for elected officials who merely try to rearrange deckchairs on a ship set to sink. We need real solutions to protect Michigan’s future, and that starts with investing in our students through the Michigan Promise Scholarship.
Through meaningful reforms, we can reinstate the Michigan Promise Scholarship. By slowing down the Earned Income Tax Credit, or EITC, increases set to take effect this year, $160 million in revenue could be provided, enough to cover the $100 million to reinstate the Promise to 96,000 students statewide. This credit for some Michigan families has been 10 percent since 2008, but the original legislation that created the EITC mandated an additional 10 percent be added to the credit for the 2009 tax year and beyond, making the credit an overall 20 percent. However, this credit increase could be reduced and subsequently used to fund the Michigan Promise instead.
Even with this specific way to save the Promise, there are some who refuse to help steer the ship away from catastrophe. Don’t be fooled, this is not a “tax increase” on our families; instead, it would simply phase in the EITC increase at a slower rate. But Lansing politics as usual are getting in the way of reinstating the Promise. It is time that Lansing hears from students loud and clear that we support meaningful reforms to invest in education. We need real leadership to steer the ship away from catastrophe.
Please join me in contacting our legislators this week and urging them to phase in the EITC and reinstate the Promise Scholarship. You can find out who your state senator is by visiting senate.michigan.gov or calling (517) 373-2400.
As Michigan is heading full-speed ahead toward disaster, we must demand action to invest in students by investing in tools that equip them for success. It is no surprise that businesses will continue to look for states that have a highly educated work force; this means that we can’t let Michigan fall behind. We must invest in education and our future by reinstating the Michigan Promise Scholarship. Don’t let the hopes of a brighter future sink because we didn’t act; call your senator today and demand they fund the Promise Scholarship.
Mitchell Rivard
social relations and policy junior and president of MSU College Democrats
Originally Published: 11/17/09 7:26pm















xx
11/17/09 8:19pm“Democrats” should bear a capital “D” in the headline.
Copy edit, much?
Jason
11/18/09 3:49pm“Don’t be fooled, this is not a “tax increase” on our families; instead, it would simply phase in the EITC increase at a slower rate.”
So, let me make sure I get this right: you want others to delay a credit that they deserve via already-approved legislation, in order to pay for other people to go to college?
My question is: why? What obligation do those who recieve the EITC credit have to the recipients of the promise scholarship? Those receiving the EITC are already low on income and need a break just as badly as the Promise recipient – except they probably can’t get a Federal student loan to cover their childcare and mortgage.
Gimme gimme gimme. Who cares who else is affected.
'08 Alum
11/18/09 11:54pmI’m all for college funding.
It’s true Daily Show material for Michigan to keep its “promise” to developers and move in to the new State Police HQ, while scrapping its “promise” to hardworking college students.
But doing it on the backs of Michigan’s poor (those who benefit from the EITC) isn’t the way to do it. I hate to say it, but people getting that help probably need it more than college students.
I’d be more likely to support a ticket tax. $1.20 extra for a $20 bball ticket, boo hoo. More commonsense than altering EITC.
09 Student
11/19/09 1:18amBusinesses are not simply leaving Michigan because of the fact that there are education problems in this state. Before businesses even consider hiring staff they need to be able to establish themselves and their structure. Through 8 years of failed leadership via the Granholm administration, taxes on businesses have risen and it is much more difficult for businesses to operate within our state. Considering the Governor and her pals are all about giving handouts, how about they ask their friends at the White House to send them another stimulus check. Oh wait, then the burden to send Michigan students to college is divided amongst every American taxpayer. Now things get interesting…