MSU considers several options for deciding school budget cuts
By Meredith Skrzypczak (Last updated: 11/04/09 11:41pm)Decisions to possibly cut campus programs and departments were made with more things in mind than the potential savings of millions of dollars, university officials said.
Provost Kim Wilcox said he considered pages of data, none of which was more important than the others.
“This is not just about cost savings in individual programs,” he said. “Data including numbers of student majors, credit hours, research dollars, research dollars per square foot, research dollars per faculty member, numbers of faculty, numbers of graduate students (were considered).”
Wilcox announced the possible cuts Friday at the MSU Board of Trustees meeting. The departments of Communicative Sciences and Disorders and Geological Sciences were included in the recommended cuts, as well as 30 additional majors, specializations and programs.
Total cost savings that would result from cutting the recommended programs and departments have not yet been established, Wilcox said.
“We’re trying to work on some kind of composite estimate for all of this, but we’re a long way from that right now,” he said.
During the next two years, MSU operating unit budgets will be cut by approximately $50 million, or 10 percent. Approximately 87 percent of the general fund budget cuts will be in funded positions. The remaining 13 percent in reductions will come from cuts to spending on services, supplies and equipment.
Almost 600 funded positions within the university are expected to be affected. Layoffs will eliminate 19 percent of the positions, while 45 percent will represent positions that will purposefully go unfilled and 36 percent will represent not reappointing fixed-term employees.
The College of Natural Science, which holds the Department of Geological Sciences, has a budget of about $57 million and will have to cut between $7 million and $8 million, said R. James Kirkpatrick, the college’s dean.
The college considered each department’s program quality, strength of vision, student demand and adherence to the college’s mission, as well as the amount of external research funds the department generates, the number of majors and the number of graduate students, he said.
“(Geological sciences’) performance in many of those metrics was not as good as other units,” he said.
Potential job losses within the College of Natural Sciences still are unclear, Kirkpatrick said.
Cuts to retailing and the Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders are moves the College of Communication Arts and Sciences must make, said Pamela Whitten, dean of the college.
Retailing is the smallest unit in the college and enrollment has declined significantly, Whitten said in an e-mail.
“The Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders will be closed eventually to save administrative overhead costs,” she said. “The CSD graduate degrees will be relocated to the Department of Communication.”
Christopher Brown, dean of the College of Veterinary Medicine, said the Veterinary Technology Program cut was one of 15-20 cuts the college proposed to Wilcox. He said it was recommended to be cut partly because there are similar programs elsewhere in Michigan.
If potential cuts presented to Wilcox are approved, the college could meet its goal of cutting $3-4 million during the next two to three years, Brown said.
Wilcox said the majority of faculty affected by the possible cuts would move to different areas on campus.
Originally Published: 11/04/09 11:41pm
















student
11/05/09 5:41amAll of you who wanted an unnecessary accreditation for Olin instead of saving money and helping MSU and your tuition, Olin has gained reaccreditation.
http://news.msu.edu/story/7066/
I hope all of you go many, many Olin so you can really value the Joint Commission accreditation, instead of saving academic programs. Don’t forget to pick up some non-accredited condoms while you’re there.
Townsend
11/05/09 10:59amMSU is lazy and not creative for saving aspects of this U that SHOULD BE important… Witness, the call for the wrecking ball for historic Morrill Hall…
… This school just ended, a few years ago, a fancy, $1.4 Billion fundraising campaign for the school’s 150th anniversary… Why not extend this for the struggling academic programs?
...View full comment »
student
11/05/09 11:56amWell, the situation of those programs is public. The University doesn’t have to spend money in advertising for people to give money to MSU.
The people outside MSU know what’s going on. Part of the job of the University is to make it public, and it has done that.
Many times we think that nothing is going on but behind closed doors are people talking and contracts getting signed.
...View full comment »
mvt
11/05/09 12:29pmProvost Wilcox,
Thank you for taking on this complex and thankless task. Thanks also to those in each academic unit who are doing their part and taking it seriously, as well.
From what is getting reported it seems as though you are looking at the right things and asking the right questions. Ignore the naysayers, there is no way everyone will be happy with what you are doing. Eliminating underperforming programs, no matter how unique, will not hurt MSU’s image.
MSU can sharpen its focus on the things it is doing well and become even better !
student
11/05/09 1:30pmGreat post by mvt!!!
common sense
11/05/09 3:10pmGeological sciences being eliminated would be horrible. I remember exchanging emails with the guy who discovered glacio hydraulic cooling and got on the cover of Nature.
Yea, we have a huge endowment, but it’s a long term investment, not to be hemorrhaged away during an economic downturn.
student
11/05/09 4:40pmOnce again, people don’t understand the nature of the endowment, of any endowment.
Endowments have a specific purpose. The whole endowment fund of MSU is composed of the individual accounts that are designated for a specific purpose. Endowments are used right away as long as they are fully funded. For example, of MSU’s 1.4 bill endowment, there are accounts that are used for scholarships, professors, etc.
...View full comment »