Pulling out all the stops
Spartans eligible for 3rd straight bowl game after defense pulls through to defeat Purdue
Tweet
Matt Bishop
West Lafayette, Ind. — In a season full of unusual games and strange twists and turns, Saturday’s 40-37 win against Purdue added to the oddity that is the 2009 MSU football season.
The Boilermakers outgained the Spartans by 162 yards, had 16 more first downs and more than doubled MSU’s time of possession. But when all was said and done, MSU walked out of Ross-Ade Stadium having done two things — become bowl eligible and ensured Purdue would not attend a bowl game.
Now at 6-5, the Spartans are one of seven Big Ten bowl-eligible teams. Only a Michigan win against Ohio State and an MSU loss to Penn State next week could keep MSU from a guaranteed bowl slot.
MSU’s road to bowl eligibility wasn’t expected to be this difficult — or heart-stopping. But when it came down to it Saturday, MSU made big plays in big spots — none bigger than sophomore receiver Keshawn Martin’s 85-yard kick return to put the Spartans in prime position for a go-ahead field goal or touchdown.
Martin was MSU’s most dynamic offensive player, just like he has been all season. The team used him in the Wildcat formation for the first time this season, a play that resulted in a 19-yard run.
But Martin wasn’t the only one making plays.
Junior cornerback Chris L. Rucker scooped up a Purdue fumble and scored seven seconds into the game.
With the offense struggling in the first half, sophomore quarterback Kirk Cousins found junior tight end Charlie Gantt for a 55-yard pass to set up MSU’s second touchdown. Senior kicker Brett Swenson hit two 52-yard field goals in the third quarter — his career high. Junior cornerback Jeremy Ware blocked a field goal try that would’ve put Purdue up 37-30. On the first play after the block, Martin took a double-reverse for 45 yards, setting up a touchdown three plays later.
On the ensuing Purdue drive, junior linebacker Jon Misch made a first-down-saving tackle, forcing the Boilermakers to kick a tying field goal. That led to Martin’s return and Swenson’s fourth field goal of the game.
But it was the struggling defense that saved its best for last, as junior defensive end Colin Neely sacked Purdue quarterback Joey Elliott on fourth-and-six from the MSU 47-yard line with less than 20 seconds left. It was the only sack of the game for either team.
The fact the Spartans made the big plays at the end only will serve as a confidence boost for the team heading into the Penn State game and in the probable bowl game.
In most of the team’s close games this season, the Spartans were leading, only to have the game slip away. This time they made a big time comeback by making big time plays — the one factor that’s been missing this season.
For the team to beat Penn State next week, the Spartans will have to continue this type of play. The offense must be creative and the defense has to get crucial stops like it did at the end against Purdue.
If the team gets better in the long run because of the trials and tribulations of this season — and it’s important to remember how young this team really is — then experiencing a 6-6 or 7-5 regular season is fine.
In the short term, you bet it’s anguishing. Fingernail length among MSU football fans has to be at an all-time low. But if this pays off in the long term, it’s easy to write off 6-6 or 7-5 for three straight nine-win seasons, something very possible with this program.
But for now, take a moment and reflect on what it’s like to be a student here when the football team is eligible for three straight bowl games. It hasn’t happened in more than a decade. Overcoming this hurdle is a sign of things to come.
Matt Bishop is a State News football reporter. He can be reached at “bishop20@msu.edu“mailto:bishop20@msu.edu.









Commentary
Add your $0.02, go to the comment form or follow the comment feed
"Double reverse" really?
(11/16/09 9:59am)Report
Um, it was only a regular reverse. Started out as an end around that got handed to Martin for a reverse. A double reverse would mean the ball ended up going the same direction as the original end around.
not a regular reverse
(11/16/09 10:38am)Report
A regular reverse is when the running back gets the ball usually on a toss, and then hands it off to a receiver. This reverse wasn’t a double reverse in the strictest manner, but had the feel of a double reverse as 2 WRs had the ball in their hands.
Tim
(11/16/09 10:48am)Report
A “sign of things to come.” What???
6-6, 7-5? Get real. What are we paying for? C’s, C ‘s?
Ask yourself: would we want an operation performed by a surgeon with a 6-6 record? 7-5? Would any of us sign up for that? I say, NO to 6-6…no to 7-5…no to mediocrity. MSU deserves better than that and MD IS NOT delivering.
Why should MSU settle for 6-6, 7-5 records. Yes the bowls are great…for the pocketbook and all that. But should we be rewarding a 6-6 record with a bowl payout and a contract extension? MD IS NOT earning what we are paying him to do. There are better coaches out there with more of a head for the game…up and “comers,” and even some on the sidelines (Tuberville!) who have forgotten more than this straff knows…combined!!
MSU owes itself more than middle of the road. More than C’s and C ‘s…more than losses to MAC teams and squeekers to bottom dwellers the likes of UofM, Purdue.
A change is needed. One should surely be expected within the next two years if we don’t see real improvement. 8-4, 9-3..or better is what is expected for that salary, MD.
EARN IT!!!
Hey Tim
(11/16/09 11:01am)Report
You do realize we were 9-3 in the regular season last year right? Way to check your facts though.
@Tim
(11/16/09 11:11am)Report
“Ask yourself: would we want an operation performed by a surgeon with a 6-6 record?”
Really? Beyond the obvious—that surgeons don’t directly compete and don’t have a win-loss record—isn’t that a little over-the-top?
The fact of the matter is that this team has not had a great season, but a few breaks here and there and you’d be singing a much different tune. The team lost the first four games by an average of under four points per…
You can say that that’s a sign of a lack of heart or gumption or whatever you want, but look at the glass as half-full… Just one mistake, one missed block, one penalty, etc. probably was the difference between a win and a loss. And this is a young team, and young teams are prone to make those mistakes the first time around.
As long as something is done about the atrocious secondary between this season and next, we’re going to have a very, very good team here over the next few seasons.
G-man
(11/16/09 12:01pm)Report
This year did not go as planned. But remember we did lose our quarterback and running back. We have an excellent redshirt class and a excellent class coming in. Disappointment in the D-backfield and we need a stud rusher but overall I think we are going in the right direction. Also make a decision on the QB and stick with it. Go Sparty
D-man
(11/16/09 11:44pm)Report
amen g-man. they should call you g-money.
jbru
(11/17/09 8:36am)Report
Why do “fans” blame the coachs for every loss? Let’s all remember these kids are young and prob over performing. How many seniors on this team? Com’on “fans” get behind ur team and stand nxt to them win or loss. Stop pointing figures and enjoy this last regular season game, cheer load, drink hard and book your flight for new years day. This is spartan country, fight for it at all means.