Religion should not be taboo
(Last updated: 11/12/09 8:11pm)Don’t chew with your mouth open. Keep your elbows off the table. And whatever you do upon first meeting someone, do not talk about religion.
Emily Wilkins
This bit of etiquette has been around for ages, and I’m sure whoever originated it was well-intentioned and probably meant to keep yelling matches at a minimum. After all, there are those who instantaneously will condemn anyone who does not share a similar belief system.
A perfect example: the Wells Hall preachers. A one-on-one discussion with one of them led me to discover that even though he and I both believed in God and Jesus and were even raised in the same faith, he still thought I was headed straight for Satan’s gates.
He also told me that drinking alcohol is a sin and he’s sure the wine that Jesus drank at the Last Supper, an important event in Christian traditions, contained no alcohol.
With mind-sets such as these in the world, I do not blame the Miss Manners-type who first taught the “no religion” rule. But in the 21st century, at a place of higher education such as MSU, mannerisms such as these are restrictive to our worldview. If we as individuals cannot freely express our beliefs and be tolerant of others’ ideas, then we need to examine ourselves, not the rules of society.
What’s more, there still are stereotypes that exist for almost all religions. Some are obvious. Since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, Muslims have been trying to disassociate themselves from a terrorist image. Those following Judaism often are faced with jokes about wealth or money. For that matter, there are incorrect notions about atheists and agnostics. But the worst aspect of stereotypes is that often they are so accepted in society that we don’t realize our perspective on a group is incorrect.
I came to MSU after 12 years of Roman Catholic schooling — nuns, uniforms and all. My family is active in our parish, and most of the people in my life prior to college believed the same things as I did. I’m not shy about my faith, but when I tell people what religion I am, the reaction isn’t always a positive one. My roommate and I went in blind, and when she found out I was coming from a Catholic school, she assumed I was going to judge her for going to parties and missing church on Sunday.
For me, this notion is ridiculous. I respect the opinion of those who find Mass a waste of time. And why shouldn’t I? I don’t expect people to agree with all my beliefs, but I would like my own opinions to be treated with equal respect.
Another bias I have found against religion that could be diffused through conversation is the notion that those who follow a religion are crazy. At first I was angry at the statements I heard. Many seemed hate-fueled, and a few displayed a certain ignorance of Christianity.
But when I realized that the anger I felt stemmed from a frustration that they made several valid arguments, I began to ask questions. I asked my parents, I asked my grandparents. My sister and I cornered a priest at a First Communion party and, for an hour and a half, bombarded him with questions about marriage, homosexuality and purgatory.
And in the end, I still classify myself as a Roman Catholic. But now I can more clearly define what I believe in. And it’s an ongoing process — as long as I can find someone who is willing to talk about what they believe.
In fact, discussion of religion should not simply be allowed; it should be encouraged. At MSU there are many groups associated with promoting racial diversity. Why aren’t there more groups looking to foster harmony among different religions? It has been emphasized that we have much to learn from other cultures. How is it not the same for beliefs?
Even if we gain nothing from such exchanges, it is important that we do have the freedom to discuss religion without being perceived as people looking to start a fight or force their views down someone’s throat.
I have witnessed people attempt to halt conversations about religion that they aren’t even a part of. This action in particular strikes me as immature. Not only are they interrupting something that is none of their business, but I can’t help wonder whether they want every conversation to revolve around the latest episode of “Glee” and the lost brown cow they found on Farmville. What’s so wrong about having a deeper conversation?
In today’s society, we should be able to talk about religious beliefs and our personal views openly. To deny a person the right to express themselves is just bad manners.
Emily Wilkins is a State News staff writer. Reach her at wilki196@msu.edu.
Originally Published: 11/12/09 7:57pm
















America
11/12/09 8:51pmNo one’s denying anyone the right to speak openly about their religion; it’s just that, as you will learn as you enter the working world and have more life experiences, the best way to get an instant enemy is to talk religion or politics. There’s at least 50-50 chance that the other person does not agree with you. Whether the person with whom you’re speaking is a colleague, new acquaintance, or an old friend with whom you’ve never discussed such things, you can watch the dynamic of the relationship completely change once it’s found out you have different beliefs and views.
Ed T
11/13/09 10:31amI support the rights of the Wells Hall preachers, but as a Christian my heart sinks a little every time I see them. Why? Because they put forth a face of Christianity that is moronic, self-aggrandizing, and mean-spirited. For myself—and for most Christians—our spiritual journey is the very opposite of these things.
Sparty
11/13/09 1:57pmIt is truly sad to see the wells hall preachers. I cannot think of a more counter-productive group of people.
Christianity is not what is portrayed by them, it is about the Truth, love, humility, forgiveness, compassion, and integrity.
Just because some people fall short of the ideal however, doesn’t mean there is a problem with the ideal, merely that people are not perfect. That is why it is so wonderful to have a truly loving and forgiving God.
God Bless!
turk
11/13/09 4:28pmPeople justify their entire lives with their beliefs, so obviously it’s going to hit a nerve when you challenge them.
Jesus Lover
11/14/09 6:45pmEmily,
Thank you so much for writing this article! I have pondered the discussion about religion many times. And maybe because I work at MSU that is one of the reasons why I’m able to be so open about what I believe. I guess a part of the reason I can discuss religion as freely as I do is because I try to bring it up in a non-confrontational way. I ask people what they believe about certain things and while this might not be the most professional approach in the world I choose to every so often bring up what I believe as well.
As for the Wells Hall preachers I would say that in some ways they do make some very valid points.
...View full comment »
Jesus Lover Continued
11/14/09 8:44pmLet me also say that I by no means endorce the methods of all the Wells Hall preachers. Talking to someone about how some “sin” gets them into the pit of Hell is sometimes very effective, but there are other times when one needs to emphasise the fact that GOD HATES sin, but he also loved humanity enough to die on the cross for the sins of the human race. Yes God judges sin and he takes sin very seriously and so should we, but we also need to show compassion for others and not only show people the state of thier hearts, but we need to show them God’s love for them as well.
turk
11/14/09 10:48pmSince when did this turn into a place for proselytizing? There’s a difference between discussing what you believe and preaching what you believe.
Jesus Lover
11/14/09 11:34pmTurk,
Sorry if I sounded preachy or judgemental. That wasn’t my intention at all. I was merely intending to share some of my thoughts on a topic I’m very passionate about.
God Bless,
NH
Theocratic Domination
11/15/09 12:08amAs an agnostic, I feel as if I am trampled on more than symbolically by our society’s theocratic intimidation. I do not agree at all with our elected officials having to say the pledge of allegiance before each session of Congress containing the words “Under God.” It’s more than symbolic, it’s indicative of an ideology that has a stranglehold on a nation’s government and citizens.
It is gratifying to discover, however, that our most powerful U.S. Senators are typically Jewish (13/100 practicing Jewish U.S. senators, quite powerful ones at that), thus belief in Christ is not a pre-requisite for rising to the mountain top of political power in America.
Child of God
11/15/09 9:10amTheocratic Domination,
You bring up a valid point. Religious diversity in this country should be respected. I for one have very little objection to a person choosing thier own faith (or lack thereof) in a higher power. Maybe our government should consider revising thier beliefs in terms of what they say in thier meetings. I for one love Jesus, but I also believe in living in harmony with others.
God Bless,
NH
Yellow
11/16/09 1:57pmGot to admit, Islam pretty sucks lately.