Turnout for Granholm's Mich. Promise Scholarship rally low
Tweet
Despite Gov. Jennifer Granholm’s plea for students to actively fight for the Michigan Promise Scholarship, turnout of MSU students at a rally Wednesday was lower than at other university rallies in Michigan.
“Maybe about 100 (were there) at the peak,” zoology junior Lila Wakeman said. “Many people left early.”
Granholm is on a tour of college campuses to encourage students to contact their lawmakers about the Michigan Promise Scholarship, which provided 96,000 students statewide and 8,200 MSU students up to $4,000 in college scholarships.
And student turnout to hear Granholm speak about elimination of the Promise Scholarship at other universities was more than double MSU’s turnout, officials said.
But Steve Mitchell, president of East Lansing-based Mitchell Research and Communications Inc., said at this point, lawmakers probably will not revisit issues like the Promise Scholarship, no matter what students do.
“This was debated extensively by both the House and the Senate before cuts were made,” he said. “It’s highly unlikely that the legislators will revisit it and make changes.”
Matt Marsden, a spokesman for the Senate Republicans, has said the Legislature will not work on last year’s budget items, including the Michigan Promise Scholarship.
Following her visit to MSU, Granholm made a lunchtime appearance Wednesday at Saginaw Valley State University, where about 400 students listened to the governor’s message, SVSU spokesman J.J. Boehm said.
“The cafeteria was overflowing,” Boehm said. “It was literally wall-to-wall with people; the dining tables were full. It was very well attended.”
And Thursday morning, Granholm encouraged a group of more than 300 Central Michigan University students to fight for the Promise Scholarship, CMU spokesman Steven Smith said.
“We turned away at least 100 students,” Smith said. “For some of these students, it makes a difference on whether or not they will be able to continue with their education.”
Following CMU, Granholm moved to the west side of the state where she addressed more than 300 students Thursday afternoon at Grand Valley State University, said GVSU spokeswoman Mary Eilleen Lyon.
At all universities, the governor has encouraged students to express their concerns about higher education funding and to make their voices heard.
Some MSU students said the fact that the Promise Scholarship already has been eliminated leaves them with little reason to fight.
“I think it’s already made up that it’s gone,” construction management Justin Lipsky said. “I lost it with everyone else.”
Mitchell said lawmakers will listen to students, but lawmakers also know age 18-29 is the smallest group of voters.
“The legislators are aware that this is a constituency that might not vote in the next election.”

Commentary
Add your $0.02, go to the comment form or follow the comment feed
fact check
(11/19/09 10:13pm)Report
I thought another State News article had the count at 150…
Melissa sharp
(11/20/09 12:26am)Report
Believe it or not some of us have to go to class because we paid for it and want an education to pay off the debts we already have. Also some have jobs too to pay living expenses and schooling.
Huh?
(11/20/09 8:16am)Report
Lila Wakeman was one of the students protesting Simon and Granholm – and this article uses her as the only source? How is that fair journalism? http://www.statenews.com/index.php/article/2009/11/fighting_for_an_unkept_promise
SIGH
(11/20/09 8:34am)Report
Thanks State News. This is really helpful and in the interest of MSU students….
oh wait…
P.S. maybe you should have let people know about it a bit more and a bit more in advance – you are supposed to let us know about events on campus after all.
Radiohost
(11/20/09 4:31pm)Report
I believe we were either the first or one of the first schools she spoke at this week. The warning or advance notice was minimal. Also, our rally was held outdoors at 10am..not a very pleasant or welcoming environment.
In regards to the students that they spoke to or got statements from…there werent many students that hung around after it was over. There were however several news affiliates willing and ready to take statements. Its not Wakeman’s fault if none of you left your statement.
Before you pass judgement on Wakeman and the group that protested Simon and Granholm, possibly you should educate yourself on their reasoning. Always assuming that protests, rallies, and demonstrations are a negative thing is pure ignorance to the issue. There are few student groups that are actually organized that can pull off a powerful and yet still silent symbol.
I personally am not going to side with the administration at this point…because its clearly obvious with the numerous other things that could be cut to save the promise funding or minimize the tuition hike..that they have the best interest of the undergrads in mind.