Sunday February 12, 2012 | Since 1909 | East Lansing, MI Advertise | Classifieds | Puzzles | Employment | Contact Us | Subscriptions
Feed:
Follow us on:
Clear, 24° F | -4° C
7 day forecast

E.L. considers raising parking prices

By Kate Jacobson Originally Published: 12/08/09 11:18pm 6 comments

Revenues raised by a proposal to increase prices in East Lansing’s parking lots and structures would go toward repairs and various other improvements to the structures.

At the East Lansing City Council work session Tuesday at City Hall, 410 Abbot Road, parking administrator Dan O’Connor presented an analysis of what revenue the increased prices would bring in for East Lansing, and what the Parking Task Force — a group comprised of city staff and downtown business owners — plans to do in the future.

Under the proposal, parking fees would go from 50 cents per half hour in the structures to 60 cents, and 55 cents per half hour in lots to 65 cents. The maximum amount a driver would have to pay in any city-owned parking spot would be $10. Director of Planning and Community Development Tim Dempsey said, if approved, the new rates could go into effect as early as January.

In the immediate future, O’Connor said there are plans to repair the staircases in the Division Street parking ramp and remove graffiti from the Grove Street parking ramp. The improvements for Division Street would cost about $72,000 and the improvements for Grove Street would be about $10,000.

Overall, the long-term improvements are expected to cost a total of about $1.8 million.

The Parking Task Force will continue to meet and assess how the price increases will affect city revenues in the next 18 months. They also will consider East Lansing’s parking permit rates and how they compare to surrounding areas, as well as examining the possibility of scheduled periodic rate changes.

“Right now we do rate changes when we get in (financial) trouble,” O’Connor said. “What we’re going to have to do here is start to look at programmed rate changes that are keeping up with inflation, so we have the money in advance, and not coming back when we get in trouble.”

Mike Wiley, owner of Student Book Store, 421 E. Grand River Ave., and a member of the task force, said the last time parking rates were increased was in 2004. He said the group’s goal was to figure out an inflation-adjusted rate that worked for everyone.

“We need to find some rate that does not discourage customers, but pays our bills,” Wiley said.

Another change to prices would be the elimination of a price difference between night parking and day parking. The change would create a flat rate for both the garages and the lots.

Mayor Vic Loomis said, in the past, the argument for two separate rates for daytime and nighttime was due to the different types of patrons at night and at day.

“Your retail shopper has a tendency during the day to spend less time than your evening diner,” he said. “The differential during the day was trying to make it more convenient for your shopper to come into town quick.”

O’Connor said the task force looked at how allowing 10 minute free parking would affect its budget, but opted against adding it because it would have a significant negative impact
on revenue.


Article Tools:
Short URL:
http://www.statenews.com/r/914840d2


FEATURED CLASSIFIEDS: More classifieds »

In Employment:

In Apts. For Rent:

In Services:


Powered by Disqus

EVENT CALENDAR More Events »

Commentary

Add your $0.02, go to the comment form or follow the comment feed

squirt
(12/09/09 1:09am)
Report
Comment

Now im not just one of those bros that always says “no new taxes”. I understand inflation, but the parking rates are already 3 times higher here than the downtown area by where I live back home. Generate the revenue elsewhere, the parking here is ridiculous.


Mad
(12/09/09 8:24am)
Report
Comment

This is ridiculous. Stop trying to make us students broke. Maybe cut back a couple of PACE employees to save money. With tuition going up, book costs, and rent money is tight. The students already support the local community by living here and going to the local stores. We can’t solve all the cities problems.


RC River
(12/09/09 8:37am)
Report
Comment

City Center II delays mean visitors might not use that new super-ramp on Evergreen. The money has to come from somewhere. Either they charge the visitors who do park, or they have to tax the residents who don’t.


Kevin
(12/09/09 9:45am)
Report
Comment

“In the immediate future, O’Connor said there are plans to … remove graffiti from the Grove Street parking ramp … The improvements for Grove Street would be about $10,000.”

Ten grand to remove graffiti!!?

What a waste of money…

I don’t spend much time downtown be it shopping or eating out. I goto Okemos where parking is free. This tax increase won’t affect me because EL already lost my business


miss the point
(12/09/09 10:45pm)
Report
Comment

Question: If EL didn’t charge for parking who would fill the ramps and lots? Answer: Commuting students and there would be no room for DT patrons. The students would park free in EL rather then buy permits for campus. AND RC River; there is no ramp on Evergreen and won’t be until the City Center project goes.


I have a GREAT idea!!!
(12/09/09 11:27pm)
Report
Comment

How many of these worthless cops would we have to lay off to make up this amount of money??