City Council deliberates smoking ban
Tweet
Beard
Triplett
East Lansing City Council discussed prohibiting smoking in three city buildings during its Tuesday work session, which would modify an ordinance requiring smokers to be 50 feet away from municipal buildings.
The council will take the suggestion under advisement as the city reviews its policy to comply with the Michigan smoking ban, effective in May.
Councilmember Kevin Beard introduced the idea at City Hall, 410 Abbot Road, citing beneficial health effects from the measure and widespread disregard for the current ordinance. He expressed concern about secondhand smoke risks at Hannah Community Center, East Lansing Public Library and City Hall because younger children and families frequent these facilities. Beard said space would be provided for employees to smoke.
“The big thing is a person may be perfectly within their rights to consume tobacco,” he said. “Should that right be extending that right to other people who don’t want to be exposed to that?”
Councilmember Nathan Triplett, however, questioned whether the solution was a new policy or better enforcement.
“What are we doing then that gets us to the point of where we have to just change the boundaries and we’re still not addressing the core problem, which is how is this supposed to be policed or is it just something that’s impossible to police?” he asked during the work session.
City Manager Ted Staton added he couldn’t recall one citation regarding the current ordinance since the policy’s inception, referring to the difficulty of enforcing smoking restrictions.
With Michigan joining 37 other states in abolishing smoking in public places in December, Beard said citizens have shown the direction in which they want to head. Taking the state’s cue, Beard said he didn’t think the proposed ban would be an “onerous burden” for people.
Overlay committee to form
The city council also approved the formation of a committee to review an ordinance allowing the restriction of rental licenses.
Staton said the city’s overlay policy — which enables residents to prevent rental licenses in a specified area if two-thirds of property owners agree — requires investigation concerning the impact it has on property values, neighborhoods and vacancy rates. Triplett said the committee’s focus would be fact finding, not policymaking.
Fred Bauries, an East Lansing landlord, said the ordinance should be examined because it is too easy for one or two neighborhood residents to preempt somebody from getting a rental license.
Bauries said his neighbor, a Lutheran pastor who was called to work in Minnesota, attempted to obtain a rental license for the home in which his family no longer lived but was stopped when an overlay district was created.
“The problem is the city has not set satisfactory standards,” he said.
“Citizens go around, basically tell half-truths and there’s no question about it, there’s plenty of evidence out there. They terrorize their neighbors into thinking that this is going to be a student rental with a bunch of kids in it, and everybody signs it.”






Commentary
Add your $0.02, go to the comment form or follow the comment feed
Hank Baskett
(01/13/10 1:16pm)Report
I think it should be up to the people who own the establishments because after all they pay the rent! But ive also seen where many establishments are carrying Crown7 Electric cigarettes. Ive seen these things and they seem to be saving businesses from these darn bans!
Thomas Laprade
(01/13/10 9:50pm)Report
The controversy of second hand smoke could be ended quickly by a simple act of legislation. Anyone presenting information represented as science or health reliant information, which is later found to be false or misleading, would be rewarded with a mandatory ten year jail sentence.
I can guarantee the bandwagon of smoker hatred would end overnight and the profiteers would be making deals in self preservation convicting each other. Similar to the last time their ilk rose to prominence and Doctors were hanged at Nuremberg. The laws of Autonomy created in the wake, are largely being minimized by the bigots and zealots of Public Healthism, they are laws we found at the expense of millions who died without them. No one has the right to make health choices for others and no one has a right to demand rights to the detriment of others, especially with the convenience of a lie, as we find in the “toxic effect of second hand smoke”.
Thomas Laprade
(01/13/10 9:52pm)Report
The Mayor and Council were elected to run the business of the city, not the city’s businesses
Thomas Laprade
(01/13/10 9:55pm)Report
Question for the Mayor and Council.
Do you think the hospitality industry has the intelligence to handle this smoking issue without interference from the Mayor and Council??