Despite lack of funds, museum should proceed
Tweet
Although funds for the Eli and Edythe Broad Art Museum still are short of where they need to be for its completion, finally beginning construction on the building is what MSU needs to do to move the project forward.
Unfortunately, progress without funding is something that is hard to come by these days. Since MSU President Lou Anna K. Simon announced that Eli Broad and his wife Edythe had donated $26 million to the university to build a new art museum in June 2007, MSU alumni, students and donors mostly have been able to hear about the museum’s development from university officials. However, when the groundbreaking ceremony is held March 16, everyone will be able to see the first physical advancements of the project.
In January 2008 the museum’s future location across from the Student Services Building was cleared and prepared for construction. Since then, it has been nothing more than a hole in the ground, and any visible progress the university can make is better done sooner than later.
Currently, MSU is $7 million short of the estimated $40 million needed to build the museum and complete its initial exhibits. But once alumni and donors actually can see for themselves that the university is serious about construction might be easier for them to have faith the project will be completed and donate the money necessary.
At the same time, it is important to remember that the Broads have now provided more than half of the money needed for the building’s completion. Instead of questioning whether this is the right move in this economic climate, students and alumni should acknowledge and appreciate what the Broads are trying to do to improve our university. After all, they’re entitled to do what they like with their money.
Although we believe the development and construction of a new museum is a good idea, the design is something worth questioning. Its modern, unconventional and downright ugly appearance makes it look nothing like anything on campus.
Despite the museum’s appearance, it will be better than the current facilities housed in the Kresge Art Center. The staff and volunteers at the Kresge Art Museum do an excellent job with what they have, but they do not possess the tools or the building necessary to be a notable art museum.
Having a brand-new and state-of-the-art structure almost certainly will bring more people to MSU’s campus, possibly giving the local economy a very welcomed boost. Also, making improvements in the arts at MSU might help create a more diverse environment and learning experience. A strong arts program isn’t the first thing to come to mind when one thinks of MSU, and now the university has the opportunity to change that perception.
Beginning construction on the museum does not guarantee the final $7 million will be donated to the university. But by putting a shovel in the ground and making visible steps toward the museums’s completion, MSU is giving alumni and other donors more incentive to contribute. Breaking ground — even without all the necessary funds — is a risk worth taking, and we are confident that MSU’s leaders and alumni will see this project through to the very end.






Commentary
Add your $0.02, go to the comment form or follow the comment feed
Lyle
(01/28/10 8:44am)Report
This is the same warped thinking that the City of EL used in promoting Their projects. Start the buying and building, worry about how it’s financed later. Worked good for them.
This is an unnecessary waste of time and effort in the current economy. Plans should be abandoned or at least tabled.
Todd
(01/28/10 10:42am)Report
What a headline! “Despite lack of funds, museum should proceed.”
Yeah, because that approach by government has worked just great up until now, right?
ryan
(01/28/10 11:05am)Report
Wait for more funds. Maybe people aren’t donating because the design of the new museum is atrociously bad. A squashed garbage can?!? Kunstler: “Another American city bends over to pick up the soap for a gang of Eurotrash art theory hustlers.” A waste of money, land, and taste.
Jason
(01/28/10 12:53pm)Report
Half-assed design.
Half-assed concept.
Half-assed expectation of return on investment.
Seems like starting with half-assed funding is only appropriate.
MaximumBob
(01/29/10 8:52am)Report
Any clear-thinking person would stop reading at the title.
Eliot Singer
(01/29/10 11:46am)Report
I keep wondering about the claim that a new museum will bring more people to campus. Maybe a few, but even with more of the existing collection on exhibit and a few new purchases, MSU will not have the kind of permanent collection that attracts large numbers of visitors. It may be able to host better special exhibits, but it is hard to imagine hosting the big money-makers we see in Chicago or New York, where most of the visitors are either local or in town for multiple purposes. As someone who regularly goes to Kresge and thinks the staff does a great job, I personally would be happy with a fuller local art museum. But I also know when I drop by to see very nice special exhibitions at Kresge on a Saturday afternoon—the time when the Chicago Arts Institute or the Boston Museum of Fine Arts are crowded and when people can park for free on campus or stop by on a walk along the river—the museum is almost always virtually empty. I just don’t see how a new museum will generate a lot more local interest, after an initial viewing, and I don’t know why anyone would travel long distances to see a collection that will never measure up to big city art museums.
Build It
(01/29/10 5:05pm)Report
In California where the Broads actually live and buy stuff.
Ursus
(02/01/10 10:51am)Report
Even if we had sufficient funds, they should not be used to build that atrocity.