Thursday, March 18, 2010 | Since 1909 | East Lansing, MI Advertise | Classifieds | Puzzles | Employment | Contact Us
Feed:
Follow us on:
Mostly Cloudy, 54° F | 12° C
7 day forecast

Article Tools:

  • Share this article on Facebook
  • Digg this
  • Add to del.icio.us
  • Blogger
  • Comment feed
  • Print

Supreme Court to hear 1st Amendment case

By Marissa Cumbers (Last updated: 02/10/10 12:32am)

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear a case to determine whether religious organizations on college campuses can require their leaders to share that organization’s beliefs.

In 2006, a ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling allowed the University of California, Hastings College of the Law to restrict a Christian organization from controlling membership by requiring the organization to offer voting membership and leadership positions to students who do not share the organization’s values and beliefs.

Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox filed an amicus brief on behalf of Michigan last week encouraging the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn the ninth Circuit Court’s ruling in Christian Legal Society v. Martinez.

Universities should allow like-minded students to freely associate with each other in student groups and create membership requirements based on beliefs, said Cox’s spokesman, Nick De Leeuw.

“For college campuses to truly be diverse institutions, they must recognize the rights of diverse student groups, including faith-based groups, to set their own membership standards,” said De Leeuw.

Although Cox said the ruling threatens the autonomy of student leadership in religious organizations, it has not been an issue at MSU, said Paulette Granberry Russell, MSU’s senior adviser to the president for diversity and director of the Office for Inclusion and Intercultural Initiatives.

“We have not had disputes on our campus to the extent that we have student organizations concerned,” she said.

Thirteen other states’ attorneys general signed on to Cox’s amicus brief, De Leeuw said.

Filing an amicus brief allows interested parties to express their stance regarding a case the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear, said MSU political science lecturer William Myers.

“When the U.S. Supreme Court has already accepted a case, usually state governments and especially state attorneys general will submit amicus briefs,” he said.

“They may all have the same interest and because (amicus briefs) are really expensive to put together they usually band together.”

MSU Campus Crusade for Christ President David Kempf said students of all beliefs and backgrounds can join the group, but leaders should uphold the Christian beliefs of the group.

“It is obviously very important to have open avenues for people in a group regardless if they are Christian or not,” he said.

“In terms of leadership, that would be stupid, if you weren’t a Christian to be running for leadership in a Christian organization.”

The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the case in December, but the hearing is not scheduled yet.

Myers said the case likely will be heard before the end of the U.S. Supreme Court’s term in June.

Originally Published: 02/10/10 12:08am




Commentary:


Elton

02/10/10 12:51pm

Sounds like an interesting case.

I’m not sure what the legal complexities are, but obviously our right-leaning Supreme Court is going to side with the religionists.
And that sounds like the right decision, in this case.

Bonnie Bucqueroux

02/10/10 3:32pm

How can you publish this story without mentioning that (1) the students the Hastings group wanted to kick out were gays and lesbians and (2) Atty Gen Mike Cox is filing an amicus brief because he is running for guv and wants to demonstrate homophobic cred to his Christian fundamentalist base. Putting this on the front page without this context is not “objective” journalism.

Anon

02/10/10 3:58pm

Bonnie you are a dumb liberal, Mike Cox did it for the good of Michigan not because hes running for gov

Here you have it in a nut shell

02/10/10 4:02pm

“Universities should allow like-minded students to freely associate with each other in student groups and create membership requirements based on beliefs”
Faith bsed groups have every right to be recognized for their own values and moral guidelines that make the memebership a common goal. If a pereson doesn’t hold the same values and beliefs then they are not forced to be a part of this group and can seek a group which shares the values and beliefs that are important to them. Don’t take away someone else right to express faith just because you may hold opposing values. Let us all be free to be ourselves.

Last time I dictate and Grandma writes, ^

02/10/10 4:06pm

*based *membership *person

Elton

02/10/10 5:24pm

Of course Cox is doing this for political gain, to win the support of his conservative base. But you can’t fault him for that — it’s how you get elected in a democratic system. It’s also doesn’t mean he’s on the wrong side of the issue.

Valentin

02/16/10 1:51pm

This would be P4PSC’s cup of tea. Perhaps we can collaborate on this and/or other similar issues.




PHOTOS OF THE WEEK:More reprints »
Photo courtesy of Wharton Center /

Performers in the traveling professional group Nrityagram perform their tradItional Indian dances.

Powered by reprints.statenews.com.