Sunday February 12, 2012 | Since 1909 | East Lansing, MI Advertise | Classifieds | Puzzles | Employment | Contact Us | Subscriptions
Feed:
Follow us on:
Clear, 21° F | -6° C
7 day forecast

Macon not charged for murder of 5 women

By Kate Jacobson Originally Published: 03/01/10 3:22pm Modified: 03/01/10 11:50pm 3 comments

**Macon**

Macon

Although prosecutors believe there is evidence linking convicted murderer Matthew Macon to the slayings of five women spanning almost five years in Lansing, he will not be charged in the cases.

At a somber press conference Monday, Ingham County Prosecutor Stuart Dunnings III said the prosecutor’s office believed Macon was responsible for the deaths, but there would be no additional sentence he could receive under Michigan law. Macon already is serving a life sentence for the killings of Sandra Eichorn and Karen Delgado-Yates, which he was convicted of in 2008.

Macon is tied to the murders of five women ­— Ruth Hallman, Barbara Jean Tuttle, Deborah Cooke, Debra Renfors and Carolyn Kronenberg.

Lansing resident Claude McCollum was convicted in 2006 of the murder of Kronenberg, a Lansing Community College professor, but Dunnings said Macon confessed to the killing. McCollum spent about a year and half in prison after his conviction before he was released in 2007. Shortly after, Macon was put on trial for the murders of Eichorn and Delgado-Yates.

Dunnings said his decision was based on the fact Macon could not receive any additional sentencing under Michigan state law, so even if convicted, he could not serve any more jail time than already allotted. Dunnings said he consulted with members of the Lansing Police Department, families of the victims and his staff before making his decision.

“He could have every opportunity to turn the court proceedings into a spectacle and to belittle and intimidate the survivors of his victims,” Dunnings said. “Following the conclusion of such a spectacle, regardless of the outcome of a trial, the prisoner would return to his prison cell to spend the rest of his life.”

Some family members of the victims were upset they will not have the chance for closure.

With tears in her eyes, Lansing City Councilmember Carol Wood spoke about her mother, Ruth Hallman, who was killed in her home after offering Macon a glass of water. Wood said her family wanted to move forward with a trial against Macon, and said they feel like “victims all over again” not being able to bring Macon to justice.

“For us, we will never be the same,” Wood said. “There is no sentence that will bring her back. Her voice will not be heard in that courtroom.”

Lansing police Chief Mark Alley supported Dunnings’ decision to not go forward with the charges, despite the case being very difficult for everyone involved, especially the families.

“I understand the emotions that the families are feeling right now and I don’t minimize those,” Alley said. “But he had a very difficult decision to make. He made what he felt was the best decision and I’m certainly not going to sit here and second guess the decision that he made on this.”

Karen Delgado-Yates’ brother, Douglas Redmon, said although Macon was convicted for the murder of his sister, it pained him to know the families of the five other women would never get to feel a sense of closure that he and his family felt.

“They’re never going to feel even as remotely of a closed feeling and I’m never going to feel it either because I’m involved with these families.” Redmon said. “We’re all family now.”

Staff writer Zack Colman contributed to this report


Article Tools:
Short URL:
http://www.statenews.com/r/dd5d208f


FEATURED CLASSIFIEDS: More classifieds »

In Employment:

In Services:


Powered by Disqus

PHOTOS OF THE WEEK:More reprints »
  • Fireworks

    A firework display shimmers and shines above Cooley Law School Stadium Sunday night after the Lansing ...

  • 44119_mdh_fea_florence2_062611f.jpg

    Florence Welch, lead singer of London-based indie group Florence and the Machine, throws up a sign of ...

  • Pile of bricks

    As deconstruction of the MSC smokestack continues, bricks pile up at the foot of the once iconic MSU ...

  • Archeology

    Paige Triezenberg, a global and area studies senior, uses a small trowel to clear dirt around an animal ...

  • Carillon

    Bournville, England resident Trevor Workman plays the carillon for the first Muelder Summer Carillon ...

Available for purchase today at State News Reprints.


EVENT CALENDAR More Events »

Commentary

Add your $0.02, go to the comment form or follow the comment feed

anon
(03/01/10 5:45pm)
Report
Comment

There have been some SERIOUS doubts all along as to whether Macon actually killed Carolyn Kronenberg or not. It sounds as if those in power have decided he was guilty of her death, though – sans trial. I sure hope they are right and another dangerous person isn’t still out there.


jbru
(03/02/10 7:56am)
Report
Comment

Hello! Read the article, he confessed to it back in 2008. I followed the whole case and when mccollum was sentenced everyone knew it wasn’t him.


KJ Green
(03/02/10 12:30pm)
Report
Comment

This is an example of a classic ethical/moral paradox where there is no right.

1a. It is right for [some of] the victim’s families to want to get some sense of closure.
1b. It is right for the [some of] the victim’s familes to not want to relive their horror via additional trials.

2a. It is right for taxpayers to expect that governmental expenditures are made wisely and not incurred where a broader public good cannot be achieved.
2b. It is right for [some of] the victim’s families to feel that the cost of a retrial is appropriate.

Bottom line, there are a number of conflicting perspectives (none right or wrong) in this situation, and a decision needed to be made. It appears that the prosecutor made a considered and deliberate decision.

PS. It is also right for a news reporter to exert a bit more effort to present more information regarding this matter. Where were the quotes from families who did not want the additional trial or statement that no one felt this way? Where was the information regarding the cost of additional trials?