Friday May 25, 2012 | Since 1909 | East Lansing, MI Advertise | Classifieds | Puzzles | Employment | Contact Us | Subscriptions
Feed:
Follow us on:
Clear, 79° F | 26° C
7 day forecast

Student groups discuss legislation, prejudice

By Ian Kullgren Originally Published: 10/20/11 10:48pm Modified: 10/20/11 10:51pm 2 comments

yjw_new_foreignlaw_102011
Justin Wan The State News Reprints

Wayne State University lecturer Saeed Khan speaks Thursday night at Wells Hall regarding a bill that bans the use of foreign laws in Michigan. Hosted by Muslim Students’ Association, Triumph of Injustice discussed the sentiment of anti-Islamic law on the state and national level.


The Muslim Students’ Association met Thursday night to discuss legislation in the Michigan House they say would severely limit the religious rights of many cultural groups across the state and address what they say is a lingering prejudice against Arab-Americans.

The bill, introduced in June by Rep. Dave Agema, R-Grandville, would limit the application of foreign laws in courts, including Muslim “Sharia Law,” which Agema previously has said is in danger of being imposed on the American court system.

Sharia law is a code that can apply to personal conduct within the Muslim faith, often involving marriages and prayer.

Although the bill has been tabled since its introduction, the MSA has an opposition effort underway. The group currently is working with the East Lansing Islamic Center to gather petition signatures against the bill, and the group’s leaders said Tuesday they would are ready to take to the streets in protest if the bill moves forward further.

“It’s kind of like you’re being banned from certain parts of your religion,” said Kanza Khan, MSA’s political action chair. “None of them … are going against U.S. Constitution.”

Kanza Khan said the MSA plans to protest at the state Capitol if the bill moves forward.

Saeed Khan, a professor at Wayne State University, spoke to the group, saying movements, such as Agema’s bill, are the result of a “moral panic” in America, caused by times of war. He said the same kind of hysteria has been impacted other ethic groups throughout history.

“If you listen to the rhetoric that has been used over the last 10 years to make a point, it’s always at the expense of the Muslim community,” Saeed Khan said. “The cultural wars that have been raging for the last 30 years bear testimony to this uncertainty.”

Agema also has been criticized by LBGT groups on campus and across the state in recent weeks for a bill that would make it illegal for public universities, including MSU, to offer benefits for same-sex couples. The representative could not be reached for comment Thursday.

“Hopefully people will see this for what it is,” Saeed Khan said. “An act of bullying, an act of bigotry.”

English freshman Rasheed Chouikh, who is Muslim, said he hasn’t been affected by this attitude personally, although he has felt it take a toll on the community as a whole, particularly since Sept. 11.

“Me personally, I don’t feel I’ve been affected by it too much,” he said “(But) I do feel as a whole the Muslim community has been affected.”


Article Tools:
Short URL:
http://www.statenews.com/r/625f5a2d


FEATURED CLASSIFIEDS: More classifieds »

In Employment:

In Duplexes/Rent:

In Houses/Rent:


Powered by Disqus

EVENT CALENDAR More Events »

Commentary

Add your $0.02, go to the comment form or follow the comment feed

B.T.
(10/21/11 12:24am)
Report
Comment

This kind of stuff really gets to me. First of all we do not need “foreign” laws in the United States. We have a little thing called the Constitution that trumps foreign law here in the States. “Sharia law is a code that can apply to personal conduct within the Muslim faith, often involving marriages and prayer.” Sharia law applies to much more than marriages and prayer. It is an extensive set of laws that can also be used to oppress people as well, so let’s tell the whole truth here. This professor has an agenda and he will say what he needs to in order to accomplish his goal. A number of Muslim’s move away from countries that have harsh Sharia law and come here to the United States for a taste of freedom (no moral police here roaming the streets thank you). To be fair there is always going to be disagreement regarding this issue and that is fine. We live in America and are allowed to disagree with each other. But we do not need Sharia law in the United States. There are people that try to “sugar coat” Sharia law for their own purposes and before you believe every word that is said do your own research. Keep in mind that if Sharia law is allowed in the United States a judge may have to decide a case based on parts of Sharia law and of course the next move will be to have a Muslim/Islamic court that can hear Sharia law cases thus ignoring our court system (ask France about this)…this opens a Pandora’s box of serious problems. The Constitution works just fine…keep it that way. While I have a great deal of respect for Muslim-Americans they are just that…Americans. So the Constitution is good enough for them as well. No hating here…just the simple truth. I am interested in what everyone has to say on this topic! Even if they disagree.


KAS
(10/25/11 3:26pm)
Report
Comment

The practice of Sharia isn’t meant to supercede the constitution, it is merely integrated into the daily lives of Muslims down to what we eat and how we interract with others. For there to be a bill that specifically targets banning Sharia, that basically means that as Muslims, we are unable to practice our religion. That was the issue with the bill, not that we wanted to override the constitution.