Goal should've stood
It was the type of play that has defined the Spartans season.
Senior defenseman Brandon Gentile fired a shot from the point that freshman forward Brett Perlini deflected into the net.
But immediately after the lamp lit, the referee at the side of the net waved the goal off — deeming Perlini’s stick was above the crossbar when he made the deflection.
All four referees gathered to discuss the call and they must have agreed that it was the right decision.
The referee then went upstairs to triple check the call.
But the only view he was given was the aerial view of the net and Perlini was well out of the view of this camera angle when he made his deflection.
So the initial call on the ice stood and the goal was officially waved off.
Unfortunately this was the wrong call.
But I’m not pinning the blame on the referees for this one. They did everything by the book. It’s just a shame the referee who made the initial call didn’t have a better view of the play.
With the deflection taking place so far away from the net, the initial call was crucial. With the video evidence being completely inconclusive, if the referee would have initially called it a goal, it would have stood and the Spartans would have taken the lead in the game.
This was a tough call because the other three referees weren’t going to talk the ref closest to the play out of the decision he made right away. His call would have needed to be very blatantly wrong for this to happen and deflections might be the toughest to judge, as they occur in the blink of an eye.
MSU head coach Rick Comley was very unhappy with the decision on the ice and thought the goal should have counted.
“It was clearly not a high stick,” Comley said. “Perlini started with his stick up (high) then came down to the puck. His stick was below his chest.”
From the press box, I had an absolutely great view of the play. The shot was perfectly lined up and the moment Perlini tipped the puck his stick was a little above waist level.
I don’t think there is much argument that the goal should have counted.
So what is to be done to make sure this type of thing doesn’t happen?
The obvious solution would be to equip each building with more cameras at varying angles and take the time to make sure you get the call right.
But it would be very costly and some buildings and teams don’t have capabilities to do this.
The referees did a good job of consulting each other, but if one of them sees the play, they can’t be afraid to overturn the initial call — especially when the video replay doesn’t reveal anything.
This goal would have been huge for the Spartans at that point in the game. It was all tied up and a go-ahead goal would have given MSU the lead and, more importantly, confidence.
Thankfully, the call didn’t alter the final outcome of the game.
Perlini continued to play great and was without a doubt one of the best players on the ice this weekend.
The Spartans brushed this bad luck play off and continued battling — something we likely would not have seen a month ago.
Maybe this is a sign of the tides turning for the Green and White.
Jump to commentsLighting the Lamp
Hockey reporter Alex DiFilippo and Sports Editor Matt Bishop take you inside both MSU hockey and professional hockey four times a week.
Subscribe.FEATURED CLASSIFIEDS:More classifieds»
in Employment:
in Apts. For Rent:
- OLD ORCHARD apartments. 2 bdrm for $500, 1 bdrm fo...
- RIVER GLEN, 2 bdrm, furn. All apts w/ balcony. Acr...
in Houses/Rent:
- AUG '10. 1230 Lilac. new kitchen! 5 bdrm/2 bath. L...
- AUG. '10. 1031 Daisy. Private, 1 bdrm, spacious. L...
in Misc. For Sale:
- Popular
- Illegal explosives thrown from car had potential to kill
- Fighting for an unkept Promise
- Police going overboard on firework explosion case
- Friends remember sophomore Rosman as 'genuine guy'
- World must come together on climate change
- After jail release, instructor remains on paid leave
- Kidnapping charge dropped for Higuchi
- ASMSU faces scholarship funding decision
- Concern for preservation of MSU classics department triggers 1,500-signature petition
- Mich. affirmative action ban to be challenged in U.S. court of appeals
- Newest
- Student found unresponsive on couch; alcohol believed to be involved in death
- Izzo displeased with MSU's 75-62 win against Toledo
- Police brief 11/20/09
- Web exclusive: Hockey team ties Notre Dame 1-1, loses shootout 2-1
- No. 21 Spartans lose to No. 5 Notre Dame by 1
- MSU releases few details about police investigation
- What could you buy with City Center II?
- Children's theatre receives 3 grants
- Jewish workplace focus of lecture
- Lecture on the mind to be held Friday
- Comments
-
somebody wake up Dempsy said: "Dempsey said he also is confident the financing will come through..."
Who is Dempsey working for?
(added 2 hours ago) more » -
Benjamin Campbell said: I dont see that as terrorism. I mean, what is his point?
(added 2 hours ago) more » -
jbru said: Come on spartans! Play hard today. Fans pick me up as I'm unable to be in the house today due to work.
(added 4 hours ago) more » -
jbru said: Izzo should have gave Roe some love, I thought he played pretty well.
(added 4 hours ago) more » -
jbru said: Izzo should have gave Roe some love, I thought he played pretty well.
(added 4 hours ago) more »
-
somebody wake up Dempsy said: "Dempsey said he also is confident the financing will come through..."
Who is Dempsey working for?
PHOTOS OF THE WEEK:More reprints »
Gov. Jennifer Granholm speaks to a crowd about the Michigan Promise Scholarship during a rally Wednesday morning outside the Administration Building. Granholm is touring colleges in Michigan to discuss the scholarship.
Powered by reprints.statenews.com.







Question:
02/16/09 10:44amWait… Wait… In a situation where you admit there was insufficient video evidence to make a call, you are going to claim that your “absolutely great view” from the elevated press box was a better and more clear view of the action than the referee had from on the ice? And this gets published? Good Job State News… good job.
Also, the standard for high-sticking on a goal is that the stick cannot be above the crossbar (4 feet). With the size of some hockey players plus their skates, “a little above waist level” can easily take their stick more than 4 feet from the ice.
MSU ALUM
02/16/09 1:38pmOh Alex. Yet another article written from the perspective of a fan, not the perspective of a journalist. We all wanted the goal to stand but there is no way you had a better view from above the stands than the ref who was at eye level. Bad call that it was, they at least followed protocol.